Dear Marshall. and all other interested list members.
Since you are the sixth person to make a similar request
today, I will take this opportunity to answer all of you with this series of
re-posts. This is the first, the second and third will follow immediately.
Sincerely. Brooks Bradley.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brooks Bradley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 23, 1999 10:45 PM
Subject: New Experimental CS X Oxygen Protocol For Unresponsive Pulmonary
Pathogens
To all interested list members.
I would like to relate an experimental protocol recently developed by
one of our younger (and brighter) staff members. He originated the idea and
assembled all parts into a working model in less than two days-------after his
original inspiration. The original problem manifested as a result of our
fruitless search for some effective procedure for attacking the bi-lateral form
of those bacterial pneumonias which have proved non-responsive to all of the
anti-biotic protocols. This challenge has been especially dear to our hearts
since one of our engineers lost his 47 year old wife (a wonderful school
teacher), at the age of 47--------nine years ago.
We have used this system on 3 volunteers----and this only----within the
past four weeks. However, we have been absolutely astounded by the results.
One 75 year old ashma sufferer, unable to gain more than momentary relief
during the past 8 years, was able to dispense with his very labor-intensive
(unbelieveably costly) hospice-assisted protocols............18 days after
undertaking this protocol. We now suspect that his ashma was the result of
some form of secondary bacterial pathogen......this because of the speed and
degree of his recovery.
Another of our volunteers (71 years), afflicted with a sub-clinical
bronchial infection-----non-responsive to any protocol----including Rife Beam
Ray Therapy, has improved by at least 75% within the past 21 days.........and
shows every indication of complete resolution within the next week or so. This
volunteer was in perfect health in every other way----except for the bronchial
disorder (complicated by a minor but persistant post-nasal drainage)
The third volunteer was an 81 year old male, completely non-responsive
to all therapies for bi-lateral pneumonia of a bacterial nature. This
condition had persisted for 6 months and he was approaching a moribund state,
very rapidly. 24 hours after beginning this protocol, he encountered a very
serious crisis evolving from major Herxheimer's Reaction. Pustule formation
was so rapid and intense, 100% oxygen support was required----and the
treatment protocol was suspended for two days, while the volunteer's condition
was stabilized. Two days after resumption of the Oxygen-CS protocol, no
supporting O2 therapy was required as the subject was fully able to breathe
adequately unassisted. The volume of sputum/pus fluid was massive. Excepting
very sore chest area (from prolonged coughing) the volunteer was much
improved. Within five days he became very alert and began to overcome his
narcoleptic tendencies. Within ten days he became ambulatory again. Within 15
days his lungs were unobstructed enough he could breathe fully, with no audio
evidence of fluid presence in the pulmonary tract. Yesterday (the 21st day)
his lungs checked to be 90% clear, with only one tiny spot in the lower left
quadrant of the left lung. His M.D. pulmonary specialist is in a state of
"schock" over the developments. His analysis is this is the most pronounced
case of "spontaneous remission" in his 30 years of practice. No one has
informed the M.D. of our experimental protocols, used on this volunteer. Our
volunteer's immediate family is so irate over the fact that his alleopathic
pulmonary "team" was totally unable to reverse his decline toward immediate
life-departure (the crisis management team did offer to place him on 100% life
support until clinical death) they wanted to instigate some form of legal
action. We reminded them of their earlier agreement with us, that regardless
of the outcome of our experimental protocol, "neither the procedural result nor
the protocol itself, would be broached with the volunteer's alleopathic
counsel". Additionally, based upon the anecdotal nature of this one case,
there is no way to prove efficacy.
THE PROTOCOL; This consists simply of using a nebulizing system
constructed from a conventional artist's air-brush assembly, with modified
pneumatic plumbing facilitating its connection to a pressure-regulated pure O2
supply. The air-brush mechanism was chosen because it provides an exeptionally
economcal means of furnishing a very small particle aerosol fog (4 micron
vicinity). Using a very simple adapter from the air-brush pressure regulator,
to the O2 supply hose coupling, plus a standard welding system size oxygen
fitting (female), the assembly is connected directly to the Oxygen port outlet
from either a small medical-type O2 bottle---or a standard welding system O2
bottle outlet (they both contain the same purity oxygen).
Using the small fluid-supply bottle which comes in the air-brush kit,
then filling the supply bottle approximately 3/4ths full (about 1/2 ounce) of 5
ppm CS, we were ready to start. The O2 system (we used two-stage regulators)
was SLOWLY set for constant regulation at 35 psi, at which point the system was
ready for use. We placed the air-brush in the hand of the volunteer, who in
turn pressed the push-valve button when they wanted to direct the O2/CS fog
mixture into their mouth-----and inhale directly into the pulmonary system. At
the end of each inhalation, the volunteer simply released pressure on the
button and shortly exhaled. This procedure was repeated until the entire
contents of the air-brush supply bottle was below the intake point of the
supplu-siphon tube (about 50-75 breaths total). This protocol was employed
twice daily (24 hours) for the entire duration of these researches.
I will post the bill-of-materials, plus assembly details in another
post sometime tomorrow. However, as a word of encouragement for those unable
to afford the $680.00 for a hospital-type nebulizer, the total cost of our
assembly, less the oxygen bottle and regulator, was less than $20.00.
Additionally, our particle size was BETTER from the $10.85 Taiwanese
bargain-brush, than from our $680.00 hospital-grade nebulizer (at least our
measurements indicated so). I will. also, tell you where you can purchase
these air-brush kits . We have, already purchased 20 of them; outfitted them,
and given them to very needy Experimental Volunteers of a charity nature.
Within the next 8 weeks, we should have some useable "raw" data, which I will
attempt to share with interested list members.
Please forgive this lengthy post, but my excitement over this exceptionally
low-cost----and promising protocol, has been keeping me awake
nights......lately.
May you all be well. Sincerely. Brooks Bradley.
