Let's see if maybe Ken, Charles, Wayne and Simon and whomever else is
participating in the ozone generator debate, the miracle mineral
thread, and whatever other nitpicking festivals that're going on can
please retire those topics before you drive everybody crazy?
I'm happy to, as long as there is no outright false information that
needs refutation...
As near as I can tell, a couple grand can get you a very nice, safe,
well controlled and durable ozone generator. You can also scratch
build or modify and adapt something much cheaper and simpler, if
you're handy enough and have the time to spend doing it.
Absolutely, entirely WRONG - - and that is the whole reason for this
debate.
Just the tubes alone that go in a real, cold plasma ozone generator cost
a *lot* of money. And in order to reach the requisite concentrations
necessary for medicinal use (this knowledge is something that is *not*
easily come by - and the tools necessary to measure ozone precisely are
expensive in and of themselves), you have to use multiple tubes. This is
the only real difference between the two different generators Saul sells
- the number of tubes, and thus the amount of ozone (concentration *
flow rate) is lower in the less expensive unit.
Yes, it is *possible* that someone skilled enough - and with the right
(expensive) tools - could build one from scratch, and they might even
end up saving a few bucks - but it will certainly *not* be 'much cheaper'.
Ode is simply talking through his backside, and I refuse to let him get
away with it.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
