But you have argued in favor of ENFORCED, INVOLUNTARY vaccinations,
Ode.
Nonsense.
Admitted, and retracted... I apologize again for making this mistake. I
still don't know what I read or how I got that into my head that you had
said that... but...
Enforced isolation [quarantine] for those that refuse, sure, but not
forced vaccination.
This is almost as bad - and you even said earlier something about
SHOOTING those who may choose to reject your forced quarantine. WHO
DECIDES? Who decides who is sick? Who decides which 'germs' qualify for
'quarantine'? Who decides how long the quarantine read: DEPRIVATION OF
THE RIGHT OF LIBERTY, aka, freedom of movement and locomotion - lasts?
George Bush? Or maybe you prefer Hillary Clinton?
There is a choice, neither of them all good or sure, but one or the
other is necessary.
Here is where we differ...
Assuming a pandemic is spreading... and that the goal is to try to
minimize the spread of the disease as much as possible...
You would advocate the quarantining of everyone who refuses to be
vaccinated.
I, on the other hand, would advocate the quarantining of all of the
people who actually evidence symptoms of said disease - and would
strongly urge those whose immune systems are compromised - whether
through poor lifestyle choices, lots of vaccinations, or some
combination thereof - to stay home, and away from other people.
Vaccination or nonvaccination would be irrelevant...
I'd still like to hear why people who believe in the safety and efficacy
of vaccinations (and therefore are vaccinated themselves, right?) are so
afraid of the unvaccinated.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
