Hello Wayne.
Re Stan Jones. I'm not assuming or speculating anything. He said himself
that he made it that way. I quote him here...
"To answer your questions:
>
> "1) I use a generator with three nine-volt batteries connected in
> series (27 volts D.C.);
>
> "2) I started taking colloidal silver in Seattle where the tap water
> is generally free from minerals. I added a few drops of salt water to
> improve the conductivity. When I moved to Montana 1998, I continued to
> use tap water but here it is full of minerals. I never had it tested.
>
> "3) I made my solution in an eight ounce paper cup, conducting the
> current for one hour. I then added one half of this solution to two
> gallons of drinking water that I kept in my refrigerator. I have no
> idea what the PPM of this solution was.
End of quote.
You can read more of it on Ode's website
http://silverpuppy.com/rant.html but I cant remember where I read the
original interview. But it wasn't the first time I'd read about this
method. In fact you can still find remnants of it on the net. Read the
details of the generator offered by this clown...
http://www.macrobiotic.org/csgenerator1.html He's including
'electrolyte tablets' in the kit.
I'll answer your other questions below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: CS>'3 nines' equals about 764 ppm in ten minutes.
From:
Wayne Fugitt <[email protected]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:34:04 -0600
To:
[email protected]
To:
[email protected]
Morning David,
>> At 07:11 AM 12/23/2007, you wrote:
I've tried to re-create the 'old method' of making Colloidal Silver
with a glass of tap water, a pinch of salt, and 3 x 9v batteries with
no current control.
I wonder where you found that as the "Old Method" ?
This was the method used by Stan Jones, (and perhaps by the new blue
man, Paul Karosan) You are making wild assumptions, speculating, and
confusing the ones that might not be confused already.
See above re Stan Jones. Re Paul Karosan I said 'perhaps' he made it
that way, but if he started 14 years ago theres a good chance I'm not
far wrong. And I dont think I'm confusing anyone by clearly explaining
what I did.
No one with a slight knowledge, or a .1 brain used the method that
Stan Jones used.
Stan Jones did. Who knows who else did the same. The method must have
been quite widely circulated (and bastardised).
>> First, Tap water, the a pinch of salt.
>> A pinch of salt is no unit of measure. Depending on how much work a
man has done in his life, the thumb and forefinger will be larger and
the pinch will be larger.
It doesn't really matter if its a few grains or a pinch of salt in tap
water. You still wind up with a very conductive solution.
After 60 MINUTES of brewing time I observed the anode. It was visibly
VERY reduced. I estimated it had lost half its volume.
So in one hour, 1150 milligrams of silver had been dissolved in just
250 mls of water.
This equates to 4600 ppm.
Only one little question,............ Just what were you trying to
prove ?
Isn't it obvious? If you used the 'old method' you create CS thats
extremely strong. Much stronger than the users may have realised.
>>So any assumption that this old method makes about 1 ppm per minute
is >>completely wrong by a factor of about 70.
It appears to me, you are the only one assuming anything.
Again........ tell me where you got the instructions for "The Old
method".
I've read the 1 minute = 1 ppm rule on numerous occassions - usually
taken completely out of context with no understanding of the variables.
But 'people' read it and believe it. Regarding 'Where I got the method'
I've partially answered that but ask Mike Devour how common he thinks
this method might have been.
You'll also note that the calculations above are exclusively limited
to the milligrams of pure silver that was actually dissolved. I have
no idea what that would equate to in ppms of silver chloride.
While you may be a chemist, a scientist, an engineer, and a PhD,
like my scientist friend, he sometimes stumbles, falls, and breaks a
leg.......... tripping over the real facts.
I'm none of those things but its hardly rocket surgery is it? And when
I dont know something, I say so.
Tap water: 324ppm / 660uS
Pinch of salt added: 990ppm / 1950uS
After 30 minutes: 1330ppm / 2650uS
After 60mins: 1820ppm / 3450uS.
You should give that away to all your enemies. <grin>
Want some? Actually I intend to use it to see if I can induce a small
patch of 'externally acquired' argyria by applying it daily to the pale
skin of my forearm. I'll keep you posted.
Actually, I was surprised to see the conductivity increase. I
expected it to remain virtually stable with dissolved silver
combining with impurities to form non conductive particles.
You mean you thought you would reach a "Saturated Solution" ?
It was certainly saturated, but no that's not what I meant. What I meant
was that a meter can only detect the conductive ionic silver. I did not
expect the ionic silver measurement to increase. I expected the silver
and impurities would immeadiately create 'non conductive' colloidal
particles until it reached saturation and then dropped out completely.
And....... a Transformer that puts out DC ? The only one in the
world I guess.
Out of many thousands, I have never seen one that did.
Would you have preferred I called it an Adaptor? ' It says 24v DC on
the label. (My meter said was actually 29V DC). Splitting hairs over
things like this just confuses people Wayne.
<>
>>>I have two friends that are both PhD's in Horticulture. They
disagree a lot, even in the field of their study. One calls the other,
a >>Mad Scientists. Maybe some consider that a higher level degree,
or a pat on the back. I think I get the point of your experiment.
Do you? I'm trying to show what happens when people get bad information,
execute the process badly, and wind up with a concoction they know
nothing about, then drink it. It sounds like you think the point of my
experiment was to inflate my own ego.
David
