[email protected] wrote:
Any validity to this statement found on another fourm?


Sometimes it is good to hear a different viewpoint. Regarding MMS: many of the scientific and chemical claims don’t make sense or are nonsense. chlorine dioxide is a good disinfectant, sure, but it is no mirace cure for anything. And while it is less toxic than chlorine it is still toxic and similar to chorine in many ways — including being a powerful oxidizing agent. For decades now people have been touting anit-oxidants for curing everything. Well guess what, an oxidizing agent is excatly the opposite and causes damage that anit-oxidants are supposed to protect you from. It doens’t make any sense. Basically just another health hoax. •




**************
Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
That is actually a pretty superficial view of oxidants and antioxidants. I am not aware of anyone touting anti-oxidants in general (vitamin C is touted as such, but for reasons other than its antioxidant status) as a cure for anything, but simply as a way to slow down aging. The body regulates both. The oxidants are absolutely essential for attacking and killing some pathogens and cancers, and the antioxidants are essential in destroying the oxidants once they are no longer needed before they cause damage to healthy tissues. Chlorine dioxide is no different than ozone therapy in this respect. If the body is actively fighting a pathogen, then taking antioxidants can actually be harmful. This has actually been pointed out by some studies that have shown that taking large amounts of antioxidants, such as vitamin C, can cause cancer to develop or grow faster. It is a matter of balance, neither is good nor bad on its own, and both are needed at one time or the other. So although antioxidants can help the body age less quickly, they can also cause it to die quicker from something like cancer. If one is trying to kill pathogens, an infection, or parasites, they need oxidants. Antioxidants are counterproductive, and can cause a prolonging of the disease, or even death eventually. If you are healthy, assisting the body to get rid of free radicals is useful to prevent aging, so antioxidants are useful. The body produces free radicals when sick. It is no accident, it is part of the body's defense. It make more sense to assist the body with more oxidants to cure the disease, then drop back and let the antioxidants take over once cured. Overall this will result in much lower amount of oxidants and free radicals over the long run, then trying to cancel the free radicals the body is producing to try to cure the disease, and then being unable to cure it.

Now I tend to agree that once healthy, it makes no sense to continue taking large amounts of AMMS. I personally only take it every month or so to make sure I am clean of pathogens, and do not take it the rest of the time. Brushing teeth with it is no different than brushing teeth with peroxides, which a number of toothpastes now contain. I guess this guy is saying that the peroxides in tooth paste are a hoax as well. I believe that there have been studies that have shown them to be effective in cleaning the mouth of pathogens and preventing things like gum disease. I feel that is the best balance, at least for me.

Marshall


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>