I have started the editing process, but it is such a huge job I have only
got a few pages in.
If Wayne is willing, I could send him the document as it is, which would at
least be "cleaner" than the original emails. I have got the original "all
in one" document ("Brook Bradley Posts") down to 3.97 MB, and down to 238
pages. The original document had vast number of spaces because of the
original email formatting; there are still a lot, but it is more readable.
As a thankyou for enquiring, here is a randomish selection from deep in the
document. It is not fully edited, but just a bit of a taster and fairly
legible. Another thing I am trying to do as etiquette is remove the email
addresses of the posters; there are a lot in there and I think it would be
better to take them out.
I hope I have not selected too large a portion to get through the
constraints of the website. I am also trying to remember to switch from
HTML to plain text, as Mike requests. I had it set always to plain, then
for some reason switched to HTML, and was never able to get it back to
default plain text, so have to try to remember each time I post. Doesn't
always happen, sorry, Mike. But I have taken note and am trying to do it
plain text (in case you haven't noticed, this is what Mike requests on the
website - the HTML format takes up too much valuable room).
Regards
Rowena
Dear nancy,
We have, over the immediately past 15 years, conducted numerous
evaluations of various alternative protocols designed to address Benign
Hypertropic Prostatitus (BHP), with varying degrees of success. Our most
effective results came from a combination of protocols, including
granulated kelp (2 tablespoons per day), powdered beta-sitosterol (1
teaspoon daily, divided into two doses), high-intensity LED light array
(using 3500 MCD BULBS...in a 10 to 15 bulb assembly)
placed in direct contact with skin surface, immediately adjacent to the
prostate (twice daily for 30 minute intervals) plus 2000 mg of MAGNESIUM
daily (divided into 2 doses). Almost any form of magnesium proved useful,
but Magnesium Chloride demonstrated to be somewhat superior to other forms.
However, Magnesium oxide, the gluconate form and others, all, were of
significant value.
One of the profound effects of Magnesium (in BHP cases) is its ability to
relax the smooth muscle tissue thus greatly reducing the discomfort of urine
evacuation together with a concomitant reduction of urgency. In fact,
magnesium proved to be the MOST effective of all protocols in reducing
Urgency.
Our results in employing DMSO as a topical address for BHP have
demonstrated to be somewhat less than satisfactory. Although spectacularly
effective in addressing bladder insults of all types (especially of a
chronic infectious nature) DMSO has not proven very effective against
embedded insults of the prostate proper. One of the reasons the prostate is
so difficult to treat for chronic infections is the nature of the tissue
itself. The prostate tissue is similar to a sponge in character and the
challenge is similar to attempting to remove sand from a sponge by
wringing/squeezing it out physically - -a difficult chore at best.
Any protocol, including hot sitz-baths, which improves the
circulation to the prostate area, has been found to be beneficial and
comforting to the sufferer from among our volunteer population. The LED
protocol has the additional advantage over sitz-bath through being much less
demanding in application, and can be executed either sitting-up or laying
in bed plus
effecting a very high concentration of increased circulation in a much more
confined target area.
While Saw Palmetto (either extract or tea from berries) does, indeed,
aid BHP, it is simply not as powerful or as rapid in effect as is
beta-sitosterol. In fact, it was the serendipitous discovery that
beta-sitosterol was the most effective ingredient in saw palmetto, which
prompted the search for other, more concentrated sources of that substance.
I hope these comments prove to be of value to list members.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
>Subject : Re: CS> CS & DMSO>Date : Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:03:23 -0500
>Do you think the DMSO would help CS to get to prostatitus, which is an
infection of the prostate? CS alone does not do it.
>Nancy...
>
>>I have read that DMSO is effective (as a transport for getting CS deeper
into tissues) at as low as 2%. My experience seems to confirm it.
>> sol
>> Dear nancy,
We have, over the immediately past 15 years, conducted numerous
evaluations of various alternative protocols designed to address Benign
Hypertropic Prostatitus (BHP), with varying degrees of success. Our most
effective results came from a combination of protocols, including
granulated kelp (2 tablespoons per day), powdered beta-sitosterol (1
teaspoon daily, divided into two doses), high-intensity LED light array
(using 3500 MCD BULBS...in a 10 to 15 bulb assembly)
placed in direct contact with skin surface, immediately adjacent to the
prostate (twice daily for 30 minute intervals) plus 2000 mg of MAGNESIUM
daily (divided into 2 doses). Almost any form of magnesium proved useful,
but Magnesium Chloride demonstrated to be somewhat superior to other forms.
However, Magnesium oxide, the gluconate form and others, all, were of
significant value.
One of the profound effects of Magnesium (in BHP cases) is its ability to
relax the smooth muscle tissue thus greatly reducing the discomfort of urine
evacuation together with a concomitant reduction of urgency. In fact,
magnesium proved to be the MOST effective of all protocols in reducing
Urgency.
Our results in employing DMSO as a topical address for BHP have
demonstrated to be somewhat less than satisfactory. Although spectacularly
effective in addressing bladder insults of all types (especially of a
chronic infectious nature) DMSO has not proven very effective against
embedded insults of the prostate proper. One of the reasons the prostate is
so difficult to treat for chronic infections is the nature of the tissue
itself. The prostate tissue is similar to a sponge in character and the
challenge is similar to attempting to remove sand from a sponge by
wringing/squeezing it out physically - -a difficult chore at best.
Any protocol, including hot sitz-baths, which improves the
circulation to the prostate area, has been found to be beneficial and
comforting to the sufferer from among our volunteer population. The LED
protocol has the additional advantage over sitz-bath through being much less
demanding in application, and can be executed either sitting-up or laying
in bed plus
effecting a very high concentration of increased circulation in a much more
confined target area.
While Saw Palmetto (either extract or tea from berries) does, indeed,
aid BHP, it is simply not as powerful or as rapid in effect as is
beta-sitosterol. In fact, it was the serendipitous discovery that
beta-sitosterol was the most effective ingredient in saw palmetto, which
prompted the search for other, more concentrated sources of that substance.
I hope these comments prove to be of value to list members.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
Hello Marshall,
The amounts of Magnesium involved in this protocol are many times lower
than required
to create consequential upsets within the physiology of any but the MOST
SYSTEMICALLY CHALLENGED INDIVIDUALS.. Much disruptive and inaccurate
information relating to the Calcium/Magnesium relationship has been bandied
about by many persons who do not have correct information .and even less
research in the matter. For example, with some notable exceptions, most of
the general population ingests an EXCESS of calcium ..much of it from
un-noticed sources in the general food supply. Magnesium is, in most cases,
in short supply for insuring good health in the average adult. We do not
contend that the proportional relationship between magnesium and calcium is
of no consequence as there is a proven interaction which is important in
human health. However, we do contend that the ACTUAL necesary proportions
of SUPPLEMENTAL ADDITIONS (MOST ESPECIALLY OF CALCIUM FRACTIONS)are
considerably different from a majority of the popular media claims, and
overblown in their specific importance relative to stated exactitudes of
percentages. The problem of TOO MUCH CALCIUM is, we seem to find, much more
prevalent than too little. The central problem revolves around calcium
UTILIZATION .not gross intake. The long-lived bromide about calcium
shortages had its inception, primarily, as a result of studies (many quite
flawed) relating to osteoporosis conditions manifesting in post-menopausal
women.
My short answer to your observation is, simply, that 1000 mg daily of
supplemental magnesium....for adults consuming anything but a
nutritionally-starved diet....will pose very, very, small corrective demands
on the systemic functions ..at least this has been our experience - others
may have effected different results. We have found that magnesium is
woefully unresearched and denied its recognition warranted for MANY
undeclared benefits in human health. Adult males, especially, are as a
group....chronically deficient in sufficient magnesium
levels required for best health.
Additional calcium (unless of a high magnitude [over 2000 mg] would
probably not impose any reduction of the magnesium's benefits. However, for
the previously-mentioned reasons....I do not feel such to be a required
component to this protocol.
If one has personal reservations relative to ingesting 1000 mg of
magnesium without an additional calcium supplement, then 500 mg of some form
of EASILY assimilated calcium can be ingested .if only to satiate their
personal health paradigm.
Be Well Marshall, Brooks.
p.s. As a personal anecdote I relate that I have ingested 1500 mg of
magnesium chloride daily (without any form of buffering or companion
substance) for the past 3 years without experiencing any form of compromise.
However, I do take two tablespoons daily, of Thorvin kelp....which would
tend to ameliorate mineral-induced excursions - from a wide variety among
the body's roster of minerals.
>Subject : Re: CS> CS & DMSO:COMMENT
>Date : Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:57:42 -0500
>From : Marshall Dudley
>Thank you very much for this very informative posting. I do have one
>question. You are recommending taking large dosages of Magnesium. It >was
my understanding that magnesium and calcium should be taken >together, that
taking one without the other can lead to some >imbalances. Do you have any
information on this? Should calcium not be >taken as well to maintain a
balance, or would calcium reduce the >effectiveness of the protocol?
Thanks,
Marshall
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:38 AM
Subject: CS>BB Posts from Rowena
Is anyone else finding the Brooks Bradley posts from Rowena scrambled
looking? Has anyone fixed any where they can resend?
Thanks in advance,
Cindy
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
