I am resending this; it is the one I forgot to put in plain text, and as it
has not come through on the list I am resending it after putting into plain
text.
As I say, these posts are just by way of treats and rewards, are pretty much
as the document is at the moment, far from perfect.
I note the document is now down to 220 pages, but there are still many email
artefacts to remove.
Rowena
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: CS>BB Posts from Rowena Random selection Teeth and LED
Again a few more posts taken from somewhere near the end of the document.
Still needs vast amounts of editing.
But your enquiry has lifted me from the lethargy of overwhelm and despair to
get little bits done at a time. You would not believe the difference made
in the past hour.
Rowena
Dear Carlos,
We have researched the effects of EIS colloidal Silver upon both gold
and amalgam fillings, for a number of years. Depending upon the chemistry
existing in the mouth fluids....at the time of introducing CS, some
electrolytic reactions can occur. They are, almost always, minor in
nature....the result of short-duration, micro-currents affecting the nervous
system. We have never experienced a case where a high-intensity, long-term
presentation manifested. This does not mean that it could not occur....just
that we did not experience it in any of our research evaluations. One note:
Particulate silver (within your parent solution) will, in many cases, plate
out on your other metal-covered tooth surfaces. Most especially gold
surfaces; but also mercury X silver amalgams. In most cases....especially
on gold-covered teeth experiencing a recent (thin covering) surface
agglomeration, just using a soft cloth saturated with 3.5% H2O2 and rubbing
the surfaces vigorously, will remove the "bronze-colored" surface
contamination quite readily. In some cases (longer standing ones) it proved
necessary to use a 6% solution of H2O2,
with which to achieve acceptable results.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. Harborne Research Foundation.
p.s. You might find it of interest to know that our evaluations of
silver-mercury amalgams {removed as a matter of dental hygiene prescription,
for causes non-related to our research) which had been subject to long-term
exposure to CS....proved remarkably resistant to chemical insult....during
our in vitro experiments. This is especially noteworthy in regard to the
effective plating which tended to cover the entire exposed surfaces of the
silver/mercury fillings. Additionally, we found evidence of micro-filling
with metallic silver, of tiny cracks which had propagated over the years in
some of the extracted teeth.
>Subject : CS>Teeth repairs affected by EIS?
>Date : Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:02:47 -0400
>Hello, friends,
>Trying to help control my chronic Ehrlichiosis, for the last 6 weeks I have
>been consuming around 10-12 tablespoonfulls of good quality EIS of around
>14 ppm strength every day, distributed in 10-12 doses from around 6 am to
>around 10 pm, and I keep it in my mouth, swishing it around, for 2-3
>minutes >as I very gradually swallow it. I started using silver around
>three months ago but in more moderate amounts.
>
>In the last week and a half I have had some unconfortable sensations in
the repairs I have in my molars, which are mostly gold fillings, but there
are some mercury amalgams. These repairs are mostly 50 or more years old,
and >for the last decades I have never had any new problem, except a piece
of old >synthetic porcelain broken and repaired two years ago in one of my
next to incisives teeth.
These sensations, in the first couple of days, were almost slightly painful,
and switched places, and affected indistinctly gold and amalgam molar
repairs, one or two at the time, on both sides, but mostly on the right, and
>almost always only on the lower molars, hardly ever on the upper ones.
I thought silver was damaging these old repairs and I was planning to go see
a dentist, but due to the fact that that this was intermitent and switched
places, I decided to wait. This unconfort has been decreasing, and the
sensations have become less strong and more spaced.
If any of you has had any equivalent experience, please let me know.
Thank you.
Carlos
Hello Marshall,
The amounts of Magnesium involved in this protocol are many times lower
than required
to create consequential upsets within the physiology of any but the MOST
SYSTEMICALLY CHALLENGED INDIVIDUALS.. Much disruptive and inaccurate
information relating to the Calcium/Magnesium relationship has been bandied
about by many persons who do not have correct information .and even less
research in the matter. For example, with some notable exceptions, most of
the general population ingests an EXCESS of calcium ..much of it from
un-noticed sources in the general food supply. Magnesium is, in most cases,
in short supply for insuring good health in the average adult. We do not
contend that the proportional relationship between magnesium and calcium is
of no consequence as there is a proven interaction which is important in
human health. However, we do contend that the ACTUAL necesary proportions
of SUPPLEMENTAL ADDITIONS (MOST ESPECIALLY OF CALCIUM FRACTIONS)are
considerably different from a majority of the popular media claims, and
overblown in their specific importance relative to stated exactitudes of
percentages. The problem of TOO MUCH CALCIUM is, we seem to find, much more
prevalent than too little. The central problem revolves around calcium
UTILIZATION .not gross intake. The long-lived bromide about calcium
shortages had its inception, primarily, as a result of studies (many quite
flawed) relating to osteoporosis conditions manifesting in post-menopausal
women.
My short answer to your observation is, simply, that 1000 mg daily of
supplemental magnesium....for adults consuming anything but a
nutritionally-starved diet....will pose very, very, small corrective demands
on the systemic functions ..at least this has been our experience - others
may have effected different results. We have found that magnesium is
woefully unresearched and denied its recognition warranted for MANY
undeclared benefits in human health. Adult males, especially, are as a
group....chronically deficient in sufficient magnesium
levels required for best health.
Additional calcium (unless of a high magnitude [over 2000 mg] would
probably not impose any reduction of the magnesium's benefits. However, for
the previously-mentioned reasons....I do not feel such to be a required
component to this protocol.
If one has personal reservations relative to ingesting 1000 mg of
magnesium without an additional calcium supplement, then 500 mg of some form
of EASILY assimilated calcium can be ingested .if only to satiate their
personal health paradigm.
Be Well Marshall, Brooks.
p.s. As a personal anecdote I relate that I have ingested 1500 mg of
magnesium chloride daily (without any form of buffering or companion
substance) for the past 3 years without experiencing any form of compromise.
However, I do take two tablespoons daily, of Thorvin kelp....which would
tend to ameliorate mineral-induced excursions - from a wide variety among
the body's roster of minerals.
>Subject : Re: CS> CS & DMSO:COMMENT
>Date : Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:57:42 -0500
>Thank you very much for this very informative posting. I do have one
>question. You are recommending taking large dosages of Magnesium. It >was
my understanding that magnesium and calcium should be taken >together, that
taking one without the other can lead to some >imbalances. Do you have any
information on this? Should calcium not be >taken as well to maintain a
balance, or would calcium reduce the >effectiveness of the protocol?
Thanks,
Marshall
>
Dear Peter,
Please excuse this tardy reply, and the manner of addressing it
(this Forwarded message).
I have, simply, been overwhelmed by off-list inquiries reference my
original post on this subject.
I believe this post, to another member, will address all of your
questioning except the one on the geographic placement of the LED assembly
in relation to the prostate. The best results were obtained by placing the
assembly immediately behind the junction of the scrotum and the body proper,
in direct contact with the skin surface.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
< Dear Tony,
The wave length was 630 nm. The bulbs were Clear Red (red light
emitted from a clear bulb). Some people claim that 660 nm is best - we
could not determine any significant difference, for our applications...
The exact bulbs we used (in our last assemblies) were catalogue #
604-L7113SECH ....From Mouser Electronics catalogue. These cost about 82
cents U.S., each.. The manufacturer's number is L7113SECH ....Kingbright
Company. I recommend you obtain some solderless connectors (# 593-cnx310000
Mouser stock number...cost about 50 cents U.S.each), which enable you to
just plug the LED leads directly into the nice plastic-case base. Also the
outside diameter of these bases yields a perfect fit when slipped into the
openings provided by the shell holders for 30 caliber M-1 carbine
cartridges. However, almost any type of cartridge holder can be made into
an acceptable receptacle for the assembly (just be sure to obtain a shell
size roughly compatible with the O.D. of the LED holders. The nominal
voltage rating for this bulb is 2.4 vdc. However, we just hooked two
conventional 1.5 vdc AA batteries in series to yield 3.0 vdc - works fine.
Actually, we hooked 4 batteries together in a series/parallel connection
for extended life. Just hook two sets of two series connected AA batteries
together in parallel and connect the output leads from this pwr supply to
the appropriate leads from each of the "ganged" LED leads. Be sure to check
each LED for proper identification for the (-) and the (+) lead - and mark
each. Next, connect ALL OF THE POSITIVE LEADS together and terminate with a
single wire for connecting to the battery assembly. This provides one set
of "ganged" leads mentioned earlier. Do the same thing for the (-) leads of
the LED group. This provies the second set of "ganged" leads from the LED
assembly. Connect your ON/Off switch into either side (+) or (-) power
leads from the battery power system and connect the remaining side of this
switch-leg to the remaining wire from the LED assembly. NOTE: Do remember,
LEDs, being diodes, will NOT conduct if connected improperly (they are,
actually, half-wave rectifiers, themselves).
The only tedious work involved, is the careful grouping of each line
of LED wires into their respective polarity groups....e.g. ALL negative
leads from the LED assembly and All positive leads from the assembly must be
connected properly---into two separate groups - each group terminated into a
single conductor for connection to the battery pwr system. NOTE: Any LED
which does not light up on test, is...probably, reverse polarity connected
(check with an ohm-meter to be sure this is not the case), if you have one
which doesn't light..
If you do not want to go to the trouble to insert an ON/OFF switch
into the system, just
twist the split lead (switch leg) from the battery (the one you have chosen
to complete the power circuit)back together....to initiate operation .
Then, just untwist to shut down.
My apologies for the detailed commentary, but I have to assume all
people who contact me on such matters are quite intelligent...but sometimes,
technically uniformed. Therefore, do not be insulted if you are a graduate
E.E.
I hope these comments prove of value to you.
My Best Regards, Brooks.
p.s. Actually, these LED bulbs are 7000 MCD AND WILL EASILY PENETRATE 5/8
" OF BONE AND TISSUE.
-
>Dear Brooks,
>Could you please enlighten me about the colour of the leds used in the
array mentioned
>above. Were these emitting a red light or a white light?
>
>Thank you for your very valuable comments and information.
>
>Yours faithfully,
>Tony Moody
>
I believe all list members with an interest in Potassium and its effects
upon human health, will find this article quite interesting and more than
just a little informative. Joe Vialls is no longer with us, having passed
away in 20005. However, he was a real soldier in the conflict with the
overzealous exploiters of the human race.
Our research group has, in our experimental investigations , found
the 8,000 mg dosage referenced in a recent posting, to be far nearer the
actual requirements for proper human health....than the ridiculously small
MDR of 90 to 100 mg, presently declared by the Health Police.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley
Http://www.vialls.com/vialls/potassium.html
Dear JR.,
I did not know Joe personally, but I did support his work. I believe
he died of complications from injuries/conditions he endured during his
extended military service. I believe he was a disabled combat veteran. Joe
was an iconoclast of the "old school", and he "took-no-prisoners" in the
conflict for men's minds. He was VERY unpopular with the "though police".
My personal choice is for potassium chloride powder/granules. I
take about 800 mg daily, divided into two doses about 8 hours apart. It
works for me.
Be well, Brooks.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
