Ode Coyote wrote:


Frank Key [MesoSilver] looked for ionic silver in blood with an ion selective probe after ingesting ionic silver.
 He found none.
That is to be expected, since the ionic silver plates out on the colloidal particles rather quickly after making it into the blood steam.
 But he doesn't say what he DID find and he does have the tools to look.
 He also doesn't say he found no silver.
I suspect he either did not test for the quantity of silver in the blood, or the information was not in favor of his goals.
If he in fact did find silver chloride, it would have been to his sales advantage to say so.
I would not think he would find any silver chloride, or if he did, it would be an extremely low level.
Frank doesn't say that Ionic silver doesn't work but attributes its power to the particle content in it.
That is correct. But I disagree. Particle is a great germicide, but the ionic portion is great for healing, allowing the body to generate stem cells at will. But since the ionic portion becomes colloidal anyway in the blood stream, the argument seems rather silly to me.
If the ionic silver is 97% ionic, "finding" a particle would be nigh impossible using the close focus tools that have the ability to see one.
I think you will find that the ionic part in typical EIS is closer to 85 to 90%.


 This is a series of unprovable negatives to be sure.
 It's not proof of anything, but it does cause one to wonder a bit.

 We don't know what MesoSilver is.  Only Frank knows that.
It is a suspension of small silver particles (a colloid) in water, in which the particles exceed 50% vs the ionic portion.
All we know is that we don't know how to make it and we DO know how to make ionic.
Actually I do know how to make such products, but the equipment costs are extremely high.

Marshall

Ode


At 12:26 PM 9/18/2008 -0400, you wrote:
This ino was printed in a post of a man treating his family after antibiotics for lyme. He has been helped with Mesosilver and states the reason ionic is not as good. I thought consensus was that it was the ionic part that is most beneficial. Here's whaat the article staed: Ionic silver is not the same as metallic silver nanoparticles . For example, metallic silver is not water soluble (does not dissolve in water) but ionic silver is water soluble (it does dissolve in water). Technically speaking, a silver ion is an atom of silver that is missing one electron. It is the outermost electrons of an atom that determine the physical properties of matter. Take away one electron from a silver atom and you get a silver ion which is water soluble. In its ionic form, silver is highly reactive with other elements which means it will readily combine to form compounds.

Because a true silver colloid consists of silver nanoparticles, not ions. Inside the human body ionic silver quickly combines with chloride to form an insoluble compound called silver chloride which is far less reactive than metallic silver nanoparticles. In fact, ionic silver cannot survive inside the human body. In the digestive tract hydrochloric acid supplies the chloride ions that cause ionic silver to quickly form silver chloride. If some ionic silver were ever able to get into the bloodstream it would encounter a large supply of chloride ions owing to the fact that blood serum is rich in sodium and potassium chloride, again quickly forming silver chloride. Only silver nanoparticles can survive inside the body. Read the detailed study that proves that stomach acid destroys the effectiveness of ionic silver in a study that tested the Effects of HCL (Stomach Acid) on Colloidal and Ionic Silver. SNIP


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1679 - Release Date: 9/18/2008 5:03 PM