On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:14:48 -0500 Clayton Family <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The FDA is one of the agencies I was referring to in my paragraph > below. They seem to have one company that they are not blocking in > developing certain silver applications, but are definitely hostile to > many others. I heard about one CS supplier that was raided by them > with guns drawn, etc, and they "confiscated" the silver solutions > that were packaged for shipment. One would think they were after > terrorists, the way they behaved. > I think I have seen vague references to a similar story online, but the punchline was "order our book now, credit cards accepted!", so I don't really buy it (pun intended). Can you supply any more information on that supposed incident? I know they can get very draconian over practicing medicine without a license, but for just making and selling CS (and not making any illegal claims)? I could always be mistaken, but I don't think so. > > The IRS is another agency that has gone off half cocked in a similar > fashion, breaking many laws in the process as well. > I don't doubt that the IRS employs illegal practices of various kinds -- after all, U.S. income tax is "voluntary", according to the Constitution, but I cannot recommend you try "opting out". Even so, can you tell me where I can find information that they are actively targeting people over CS? > The World Health Org has it's own prejudices. You could check in to > the abuses by baby formula makers, and also abuses by Big Pharma in > testing vaccines on the poor of the world. Not saying it is their > fault, but the decisions they make affect lots of people, even if > they are well meaning, there is some harm done. > Very true, but some corruption is always going to be inevitable. If we require every agency to be perfect then we might as well just dispense with the whole notion of government. Not something I would consider realistic... > > I guess they will tell us to click our heels together three times > and chant "There's no place like home" . They already tell people > their illnesses are all psychological with no basis in physical > problem, I have never heard *that* from the FDA or the WHO. In fact, wouldn't that idea be anathema to Big Pharma? I think I see the opposite: medications for depression, "jimmy legs", dry eyes, "E.D.", etc, etc, etc... Their idea appears to be that no-one can get control of their quality of life without pharmaceuticals, and that there's a pharmaceutical answer for everything. If it was all just psychological, then why push the meds? indi -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
