Hi Wayne,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:07:54AM -0600, Wayne Fugitt wrote:
> At 06:40 PM 11/11/2008, you wrote:
>> The urls were presented incorrectly.
>
> Unfortunately, my friend, you do not know correct from incorrect or
> from  a hole in the ground.
>
> You either have a stupid browser,  stupid router,  stupid  mail program,
> or operating system.    Or all of the above.
>
> Or a combination thereof.
>
>  I tried every link that Rowena posted, and all the ones I posted, and
> 100  % of them worked, ........ yes, worked perfectly.
>
> ( all the ones you posted worked just like the ones Rowena Posted and  
> like the ones
> I posted )
>
> I tried them several times, .......... 8 or 10. .......... Not one  
> failed.  Not once did it fail.
>
> I have not a clue of what problems exist.
>

Yep, confirmed.
They worked prefectly for me, as well.
Probably a microsoft issue.



> Maybe you can define a  "Universal Link" that works everywhere, under  
> every condition.
> or .......... 100 % compatible links.  If they work for me, they should 
> work for everyone else.
>
> And.......... I never post any link without testing it.......... never,  
> never, never...........
>
> If you recall, several people were blaming my old, two bit web pages for 
> crashing their browser.
>
> And they were all wrong as well.
>
> My web pages are 12 to 15 years old, some of them,   and Microsoft and 
> other web page
> crutches had virtually nothing to do with them.
>
> They are all made with a Plain Jane, ...... Two BIT  ASCII Editor, one of 
> the best in the world
> called   Q-Edit.
>
> I typed and hacked every web page,
>
> Some new browsers may not work, or work perfect with my old web pages.
> But, ......... blame them for no intelligence to use the old standard, 
> ..........
> do not blame me or my old web pages.
>

A good command-line text editor and some knowledge of HTML  is all you need to 
make 
a fine web page, Internet Exploder's bad manners notwithstanding. :)

A lot of people have no idea about "compatiblity", "standards", or the fact
that email and browser software on an out-of-the-box windows install respects 
neither. 
That's how microsoft manages to establish "defacto standards" that fly in the 
face of
actual standards.  A dirty trick to keep people dependent upon their brand
of software.

Now that more people are using mozilla products for mail and browsing, it's
throwing a wrench in microsoft's plans.

But I'll bet you already knew that.
:)

Cheers,
indi

-- 

WARNING: This message may contain sarcasm, dark humor, disagreement, and 
honesty. 
In case of headache, elevated blood pressure, violent thoughts and/or rage,
please discontinue use. 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>