Thanks for this information, Bob. Theoretically the SOTA magnetic
pulser should also work for this application, though whether it really
does is hard to say. One can't can't inside the dentin to check,
after all. Even if symptoms are gone, one can't be sure the
underlying problem is gone.
The theoretical advantage of the magnetic pulser is that the magnetic
energy penetrates deeply, supposedly sending microcurrents of
electricity perpendicular to the magnetic wave.
I've read about the device you mention several times on this list, but
haven't used it. One you use your device, do you put the sponges
directly on the tooth, front and back, or on the gum tissue above the
tooth?
BTW, avoiding a root canal and dealing with tubule infection after one
might not be quite the same. I'd be interested to hear other
anecdotes as well, particularly post root-canal.
I recall there's been quite a lot on this list about the topic. Nina
Sylver mentioned Rife technology as one method that supposedly works.
Thanks again.
On Wednesday, Apr 22, 2009, at 13:42 Asia/Tokyo, Bob Banever wrote:
Jonathan,
In case you aren't aware, you can pretty much sterilize the
inside tubules of any tooth and root by using direct DC current at a
low 3 - 6 volts (some claim you only need 1.5 volts). There is a
device called the Godzilla that achieves this with the use of
batteries, some wire, a sponge, and rubber bands. Go to
microelectricitygermkiller group on Yahoo for more info. I got rid of
two bacterial infections in the roots of two teeth using it and
avoided a root canal both times. It can be used for other infections
as well.. sort of an offshoot of the Beck device for blood
electrification and subsequent neutralization of viral particles.
Good luck.
Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan B. Britten"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [RE]CS>Teeth whitening
Dear Brooks,
I wonder whether your research gave any clues as to whether the
mixture described below might penetrate deeply enough into a tooth to
have any ameliorating influence on root-canal work.
You're familiar, I'm sure, with the late Dr. Weston Price's research,
indicating that the tubules in root-canal teeth can become badly
infected. Price was evidently unable to disinfect such teeth, but
that, of course, does not indicate that it can't be done! I wonder,
for example, whether DMSO was known to Price, or even existed when he
did his research.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
On Tuesday, Apr 14, 2009, at 11:13 Asia/Tokyo, Brooks Bradley wrote:
Hello Dee,
In answer to your question......We have utilized H202 in
concentrations beyond 16%----for whitening effects on teeth....with
minor, but sometimes irritating effects. In at least 80% of the
volunteers utilizing 16% H202-----tissue-burn was evident by the
whitened skin surfaces (even though only the outer tissue level was
involved). In a majority of these cases some discomfort did
manifest....but no scarring evolved. At 12% the local "heating
effect" was
noticed by ALL participants, but presented as a distinct irritation
in only about 20% of these researchers. At 9% none of our volunteers
experienced any "distinctive discomfort", whatever, but the sudden
onset warming, momentarily, caused some of them concern. Everyone
using 6% achieved excellent results and at much higher speed....than
at 3.5%----but I wanted to err on the side of caution.....that is
why I limited my recommendation to the lower concentration. Besides,
3.5% is very easily obtained from any drug store in the
U.S....higher concentrations are not nearly as easy to find at the
more convenient retail outlets.
I might add an explanatory comment that could prove
useful....SOMETIMES, among a population of persons presenting with
various stages of gum insults---using even 3.5%
concentration----(many are not even aware of such conditions), do
experience some rapid-onset stinging discomfort (usually quite
short-lived).
This condition evolves as a result of the accelerating effects of
the oxygen's heat-releasing effects upon encountering an anaerobic
debris-field, or low-grade infectious insults. It is nothing to
cause major concern, but is, many times, quite unexpected.
If one does choose to employ 9% strength H202, it would be advisable
to have a glass of plain water handy----for dilution, just in case
they desire rapid quenching of the oxidation reaction occurring
within a pronounced anaerobic tissue field----or even a very tender
area. If one does, actually, incur the "bleaching effect" (actually,
the white-appearing tissue is a minor tissue-burn and will require a
day or two before it sloughs off and is replaced by new tissue), it
is, as a matter-of-course, usually self-correcting.
I apologize for such a lengthy response...but few individuals among
the general population appear to possess an adequate knowledge of
the properties/effects of H202....especially at strengths beyond
3.5%.
I hope these comments prove helpful. Sincerely, Brooks.
---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : CS>Teeth whitening
Date : Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:43:44 +0100 (GMT Standard Time)
From : "Dee Fitzpatrick" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Hi Brookes. I am trying your formula of H202 plus DMSO for teeth
whitening. The only thing is, over here in the UK the only H202 we
can get over the counter is 9%. Would I need to dilute this before
adding the DMSO? Many thanks in advance. Dee
Dee -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal
Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at:
http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to:
[email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to:
[email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List
archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour
