Could many glasses of say a 20 ppm per day replace the 250 ppm concentrate...just multiply the dosage of the 20 ppm?
Sharlene On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:52 AM, John E. Stevens < [email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Bob Beck said 3 - 5 ppm is adequate. Others say 7 - 10 ppm is > adequate. I know of only one person who used 250 ppm to wipe out the flesh > eating disease - which is very serious. But it did wipe it out. That was > very costly - at around $350.00 a quart... Horribly expensive. > SOTA tested the shelf life of 7 - 10 ppm and found that after 5 years, > it was still suspended and it tested at 7 - 10 ppm - which is excellent. > Storing CSW in amber colored glass bottles is the only way to go as far I'm > concerned. If stored in plastic bottles, the silver is drawn magnetically, > somehow, to the interior walls of the plastic. I wouldn't store anything in > plastic because of the BPH (bephenols) content and the leeching factor. I > store my refrigerated food in glass, not plastic. I also store all of my > Spring water (which I retrieve from a pure local Spring) in gallon glass > jugs. I wouldn't drink tap water if I was paid thousands to do so. And I > filter my shower water - I don't want chlorine touching my precious body in > any shape, way or form. It's a scientifically known cancer causer and it > scratches (tears) little scars in the veins and arteries that then need > cholesterol to patch them - thus causing cholesterol blockages to build-up. > YUK! Of course I don't want any fluoride or the other 138 some odd > contaminants in tap water touching my precious temple (body) either. > Fluoride is another well known and scientifically proven cancer causer. > I don't use a microwave because it changes the molecular structure > of anything that is "nuked" in it. In fact, I won't allow a microwave oven > in the house. Same thing with cell phones - the EMF's are too dangerous to > the brain. There are many M.D.'s that think there will be a brain cancer > epidemic in the USA because of overusing cell phones - especially amongst > the youngsters. Canada has already warned their populace of the dangers of > cell phones, but the USA is too greedy to do so. > In good health. > > John > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Paul Bond <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it’s much safer (and effective) to stick to around 10ppm or >> less, and if necessary then drink more. There’s only so much that can stay >> in suspension while keeping particles small, and my understanding is 10ppm >> is comfortably under that kind of threshold. >> >> >> >> *From:* felipe lopez [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* 06 September 2009 10:10 >> *To:* chat definitivo de plata coloidal >> *Subject:* CS>120 ppm >> >> >> >> Hello friends,somebody knows if is dangerous to take colloidal silver in >> 120ppm,because the normal is between 10ppm. >> Thanks. >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >> signature database 4400 (20090906) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> > >
