Meters in general are the wrong tools to start with..but the best that anyone can afford. Since it's only an approximation at best , 10ths of a uS might not be worth the price difference.

Ode


At 11:47 AM 10/26/2009 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks Kathryn. The HM AP-2 does measure in EC as opposed to ppm. I did notice that the sensor in the HM COM 100 is replaceable & it does measure to a smaller increment 0.1. Are these things that one needs to be concerned about or is it just an added plus? Reason I ask is I need to be economical but also don't want to cut myself short in getting the proper equipment to do the job right. :)


--- On Mon, 10/26/09, Clayton Family <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Clayton Family <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CS>EC meter
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, October 26, 2009, 1:09 PM

not about the company, but I have the HM COM 100 and love it. I prefer one that reads directly in EC, not ppm, although the com 100 will also read ppm, I like my data straight, without having to double the reading.

kathryn

On Oct 26, 2009, at 11:17 AM, lk wrote:

Found this website, <http://www.eseasongear.com/tds1.html>http://www.eseasongear.com/tds1.htm l Considering the HM Digital AP-2. Their prices seem to be very reasonable. Any thoughts about this meter? Anybody have experience with this company?
TIA


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>