It's even tougher for a "0" reading...Could be 100 times multiplier...
BWAHAHAHAHA....
Chuck
Never make anything simple and efficient when it can be complex and
wonderful
On 10/28/2009 8:29:51 PM, sol ([email protected]) wrote:
> Ode Coyote wrote:
> >
> >
> > A TDS, in effect reads in every OTHER digit of conductivity..not even
>
> > whole numbers.
> >
> >
> That's something like 40% as good as a COM-100
> Please clarify this for me. A TDS'
> smallest reading is 1.0? If that is
> right what you are saying is that the actual microsiemens reading of a
> TDS showing 1.0 is 2.0 microsiemens? Yes? No?
> thanks,
> sol
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.36/2465 - Release Date: 10/28/09
09:34:00
