Hi Ivan,

I concur with you on these issues, though I feel that my opinion is only 
marginally qualified.   I am getting a sense that the net effect of 
attractive and repulsive forces are a function of particle proximity, which 
is a function of concentration and particle size---when originally 
separated from the electrode.  Among many other factors, of course.

I think we need to give careful attention to noting if the dimension is 
given as diameter or  radius.  I think I may have compared one with the 
other at various times.  Those simple little details give you a 100% error 
in a blink.

What does Brooks Bradley know that causes him to  prefer 5 PPM?  Has anyone 
ever asked?  Brooks, if you see this, please comment.

If ions come off the electrode, how do they get together in larger groups 
if they all have a + charge?  If an ion already has a + charge,  as a 
valence, then what is the effect of the electron which gives a cluster a + 
charge on a group of neutral atoms?   A +2 charge?  Ah, to spend a day with 
a very experienced electrochemist...

I am going to get a flick of my silver bits as soon as I can get the 
process  a little more standardized and a wad of FRNs to pay for the scope. 

Probably sometime this century.

James Osbourne, Holmes

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From:   Ivan Anderson [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent:   Saturday, August 28, 1999 10:57 PM
To:     [email protected]
Subject:        Re: CS>Ion size was buying CS


----- Original Message -----
From: James Osbourne, Holmes <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, 29 August 1999 07:16
Subject: RE: CS>buying CS


> Covalent radius is still larger than 1.26 A.,  at 1.34.  If the
size is
> 1.26,  that could be one atom only of  ionic silver;  not a
cluster of
> atoms with a charge---regardless of the consequences of that.
And, 1.26
> may be smaller than one silver ion.

I use web elements for reference:  http://www.webelements.com/
who note that the covalent radius is 153 pm (1.53 A).
Yes, silver ions (Pauling radius of silver ion 1.26 A).
The electrophoretic method may be a better way to determine
particle size, due to the fact that samples for electron
microscopy must be dried before scanning, which possibly leads to
changes in particle structure. The electrophoretic method
measures the speed of particles under the influence of a
potential in a liquid medium (water). Then applies some
equations, to calculate the effective radius of the particle. The
size of the silver ion  is found to have a radius of 0.145nm
(1.45 A) by this method.

>  When I made sol with 3 9V batts, a lot of it fell out of
solution, so some
> of it must be quite a bit larger than 1.26 A.

There's the rub, whilst silver leaves the anode and enters the
sol as single ions, how long they stay discrete and in what form
they ultimately find equalibrium depends on the configuration of
the generating parameters. These are the very variables we
struggle with daily on the list. It can be assumed (in my
opinion) however, that few if any silver sols contain single ions
but rather particles of two or more ions.
Of course there are other particles which may enter the sol via
the cathode build up.

> I want to see a picture  of the stuff with a nm scale in it.
Does anyone
> have one?  I think there will be a wide range of sizes present;
and that
> could be a good thing.

You're not going to get one are you ;-)

> James Osbourne, Holmes

Ivan



--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
[email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
[email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>