The design is indeed simple.   I'm sure other designs would work well too, but 
not only is the correct pitch important, but it must have a way to convey this 
pitch to the lungs.  One wonders if an electrical vibrator pitched to the right 
frequency would do the job.   It would likely be more expensive to produce, but 
could have the advantage of being tunable in case some people have lungs with 
cilia that vibrate at a slightly different wavelength.   Hard to believe that 
every single human has lungs tuned to 16 mhz exactly, but maybe at that low 
threshold accuracy is not as important.


--- On Sat, 1/9/10, Renee <gaiac...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Renee <gaiac...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CS>Unidentified subject!
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, January 9, 2010, 9:37 PM


 
 
#yiv886187764 v\00003a* {
}

#yiv886187764 v\00003a* {
}






 I have zero music background so don't understand any of it, but in reading the 
comments on the first link a person posted this.  Is it true?
 
>>The solution is simple. Make a one note musical instrument with the same 
>>basic design. Then cover the hole with your finger to get the same vibrations 
>>as the lung flute. Anyone can design and make one and the FDA would not be 
>>able to do a thing about it.
 
-------Original Message-------
 
 
http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/innovator/pied-piper-mucus