I have been buying the sodium ascorbate but have now ordered a whole food type (darn) as the ascorbate version is cheaper. I can't afford the liposomal version as it is too expensive. Thanks for the info. dee
On 13 Jan 2010, at 02:44, Paul Bond wrote: > I would go for ascorbate every time, since as I understand it, that is what > humans cannot produce themselves (unlike the vast majority of mammals). > Specifically I would go for a Liposomal version, as it’s absorbtion rate is > so high compared to regular supplementation, and doesn’t have bowel tolerance > issues. I would go as far as to say that it’s even superior to IV > supplementation due to its affinity to cell absorbtion rather than free > roaming. There’s some compelling evidence to suggest that under some > circumstances it’s worth going to 50-100g per day(!!), in cases such as > cancer, as within the cell it can convert to H2O2. > > > Thank you Brooks for that really helpful article. Can you say whether in > your opinion, it is better to take sodium ascorbate or a whole form of vit C. > Thank you again and may you have many more Happy New Years! dee > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 4765
