Which is why a million questions need be asked so it can be logged and put up against another case which may come to light in the future, then comparisons can be made and a more accurate assessment may ensue. It's more a matter of *how much* information will/can be willingly/readily given or extracted from the individual and what conclusions, if any, can be drawn based on that information. Most correlate 'CS' with argyria, but that 'CS' usually constitutes *anything* that contains silver, or even the smell of silver? That alone prompts a thousand questions...Fairly difficult to determine with a degree of accuracy one way or tuther I would think from information available on the net today...Questions, questions, questions...Answers not entirely convincing or praps even trustworthy...supposition, inuendo, trickery, and some of course are outright lies...doesn't make an assessment any easier for or against! So, best everyone keeps plugging away on their own I spose using themselves as 'case studies', guinea pigs, or lab rats...each convincing themselves and/or making their own deliberations along the way. N.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:04:29 -0800 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: CS>Anecdotal Evidence and CS I'm always reluctant to accept anecdotal evidence at face value. _________________________________________________________________ Time for a new car? Sell your old one fast! http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157637060/direct/01/
