----- Original Message ----- From: <bober...@swbell.net> To: silver-list <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Thursday, 9 September 1999 23:48 Subject: CS mystery solved
Mystery...what mystery? >Hi Ya'All; >"Ole Bob" is back to stir the proverbial pot once more. >>snip<< > As Aquriam Bill so elequently stated if you don't polarity switch and > stir you have one big mess. Being eloquent doesn't mean being correct. There are other ways to generate CS without having a mess. Tell me again why I need to switch polarity... How is that an improvement over current limiting? What percentage of the suspended silver is ionic vs metallic? > Tomorrow I will publish the starting currents, the bulk resistance at > end of run and next day. Also the time it took to reach the final > current and the ppm. You will be amazed. at the predicability of the > process. Well I suppose some may be, however, the predictability of CS generation has been well established. Of course the parameters of one system do not relate to another, so these results (interesting as they are) only relate to the generator... which you never advertise on list. > When the tabulated data comes out I hope that some of you number > crunchers will look at it. > > > "Ole Bob" "Young Ivan" Oiling the turbulence. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
