Re: [RE]CS>Anecdotal information:ANSWER.

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:42:35 -0800

Dear Harvey,
Please forgive my tardy response, but it is only by chance I checked my Junk mail box file a few moments ago and
found the body of your message. I do not know why it went to the Junk file.
My answer to your first question is: we checked for particle size as a major parameter. Second, the power level,
in watts.... driving the transducer DOES affect the particle size (AT Least we found it so). The higher the power, the smaller the
majority of the particles (condition held until power levels of our largest lead zirconate-titanate transducers went beyond 1000 watts per transducer.) No effective reduction occurred beyond these power levels (Power Spectral Density evaluations). However, it WAS NOT necessary to reach these power levels to obtain excellent nano-size liposomes. 200 watts driving a transducer at 38K Hertz....yielded excellent results.....even with the high-power lead zirconate units. The larger Harbor Freight unit does, in fact, yield smaller particle liposomes (but the particle size from the small unit was perfectly acceptable for our experiments---and the results gained were, also, quite acceptable as effective......in our in vitro evaluations). It should be noted; to get reliable population density numbers, the samples had to be dehydrated completely....before viewing with the scanning electron microscope (the same problem is encountered with colloidal silver particle evaluatio! ns). Ultrasonic energy aggitating does facilitate the increased creation of nano-size particles. In fact, Ultrasonic energy was the FIRST energy source to actually achieve this level of size reduction (so I am informed by staff members more conversant with this technology...than am I). Diffraction grating came later.
While we have not conducted detailed analyses using calcium ascorbate as the vitamin C component, there seems to be
no contravening reason that would seriously modify the excellent results we enjoyed with sodium ascorbate. However, the coefficient of absorption for sodium ascorbate in higher mammals does indicate to be superior to calcium ascorbate (so I am informed). The principal reason calcium carbonate is utilized by most commercial vendors is to mitigate against the alimentary challenges presented to some....by the acid form (ascorbic acid). The absorptive ability of sodium ascorbate in humans---as against that of ascorbic acid, demonstrates to be over two orders of magnitude ( about 3000 times according to Dr. Gerard Judd).
One comment I might add: If a subject is orally consuming LARGE quantities (over 20 grams daily) of vitamin C (especially in the ascorbate form), additional improvement levels, via liposomal additions, in addressing the existing insult may be less than striking (especially if the subject presents with excellent systemic absorption characteristics)....if only because influence levels of the current dosage regimen are reaching near the upper "practical" limits for vitamin C----in these cases. However, I have no measured corroboration for such a phenomenon.
I hope these comments have been an aid toward addressing the intent of your questions.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.











---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------

Subject : Re: [RE]CS>Anecdotal information

Date : Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:18:41 -0600

From : Harvey br <[email protected]>

To : [email protected]


Hello Brooks:



I will apologize for "butting in" but did not know how to reach you

except for the sliver list.



I am on another list where we are making your "home brew" of Lecithin

and Ascorbic Acid and some of us who are already taking Vitamin C in the
Calcium nano form are not seeing any results from the home brew on

top of our normal regimen.


This raised the question of whether your electron microscope tests



1. Checked only the encapsulation process or

2. Checked for size of the encapsulated Vitamin C to see if it was

br. If PSD cannot be achieved via ultrasonic encapsulation, then we

were only adding to our existing GI tract loading of Vitamin C and this

might account for the "non results". Some of us are close to bowel

tolerance using Calcium br several times a day so, a little more

Vitamin C via the GI tract route might not be perceptible.



We have used inexpensive to reasonably expensive ultrasonic cleaners in

the process as the thought crossed my mind of whether the strength of

cavitation tied to Metzler would produce a smaller encapsulate.



Any info you can share about your electron microscope analysis of the

the particle size of the encapsulate would be greatly appreciated.

I will apologize for this being slightly off topic but think that many

on the silver list will also be very interested in this topic of

encapsulation of Vitamin C.


Harvey brHouston, Tex



DMSO br wrote:

> Hi Brooks -- thank you for your response -- but sometimes you talk
> *over my head*! br
>

> I don't know what you mean by "br this protocol".

>

> And are you saying that if I don't add br to the CS, that I will

> create a tissue-granulation within the earlobes, rather than normal

> healing? And that adding the br will facilitate the constant

> drainage that you referred to?

>

> Sorry to have to require more of your time.

> MA
>

>
>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> *From:* Brooks Bradley
>
> *Subject : *CS>Anecdotal information

>

> Dear br,
> We have found that the addition of as little as 5% br (by volume) to

> the parent solution of CS....results

> in, almost, an-order-of=magnitude increase in

> penetration/br.....even on deep-br wounds. When applied
> immediately after an application of Hydrogen Peroxide (even the 3.5%

> commercial norm)-----and allowing sufficient time

> for the foaming action to cease before application of the CS X br

> mix.....will appreciably accelerate the beneficial effects.

> This simple protocol has demonstrated to be effective against a

> multitude of quite noxious and slow-responding

> open-wound insults.

> Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.

> p.s. Forgive my MaryAnn this protocol, but it is vital...for
> acceptable,immediate. results, that ALL deep-penetration

> wounds (most especially in the early stages) be maintained in a

> "constant-drainage" condition. Interestingly, the colloidal

> silver based protocol will, "unaided" by ancillary

> measures....facilitate a very powerful tissue-granulation occurrence.

>

> *Date : *Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:09:38 -0800 (PST)

>

> *From : *br br

>

> *To : *[email protected]

>

>

>

-- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour