Good Morning Bob, > Evidently you did not get the chart for the data on the graphs that I sent > separately .
No, I hadn't seen it :-(. > I will attach it now. Many thanks! Most interesting. As a purely SWAG (scientific wild arsed guess :) I think I now have an idea of what PPM concentration (range) I may be in. (15-21). What I have been coming up with does *taste* more "bitter" than the stuff I remember from a while back that I purchased (no idea what that was, but I would suspect maybe 5 PPM). The only thing I seriously wonder about here is the Rbf which is the only thing severely out of line with your data from the same basic Ico. The ending currents are not cut off precisely at 4 mA, these were caught as soon as polarity shifted to meet the metering configuration I had setup (only measure on positive polarity) On the Icf of 4.95, I got distracted :). I've since added current limiting to my generator and a more flexible metering arrangement. All R values are computed, I'm still trying to scrounge up the materials for the 1 cm probe. There is a plot of this on the website: http://vikki.oz.net/~vikki/csr/v4run.jpg I just haven't gotten these batches properly posted yet, a bit much going on around here at the moment :-) :-(. Yes :-), I know it was 5 runs, it was late when I got that data in and the chart setup and exported to the web site, I had originally planned to leave the batch with the Icf of 4.95 out of this since I missed the 4 mA point by so much. Water: Cullysprings all batches. Switch: 1 x 60sec (cycle: 60x60). Ico Icf Time Vo Vf Rbo Rbf ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- 0.64 4.29 1:15 40.70 36.90 63,594 8,601 0.72 4.13 0:56 40.60 36.90 56,389 8,935 0.58 4.95 1:00 40.90 36.30 70,517 7,333 0.60 4.18 0:57 41.20 37.10 68,667 8,876 0.59 4.27 0:58 40.70 36.60 68,983 8,571 Electrodes were not cleaned off after the first batch. No fall off worthy of note in the solution at end of process for any batch. Electrodes are a uniform medium to darkish grey with the exception of aproximately the lowest 1/8" (or less - not uniform) is tanish (they have just been resting on the desk for a day or two now). All batches had a moderate TE and the Icf of 4.95 was noticibly stronger. No sparklies were noted. However there were "vertical lines" in the TE at places that were VERY narrow but noticible in the absense of the TE where those passed through the beam. Anyway, I included all this as it might be of interest ?!? Very much appreciate your work and efforts! Thanks & take care, Vikki. -- Victoria Welch, WV9K, DoD#-13, Net/Sys/WebAdmin SeaStar.org, vikki.oz.net #include <coffee.h> "Walking on water and developing software to specification are easy as long as both are frozen" - Edward V. Berard. Do not unto others, that which you would not have others do unto you. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
