Often we see things as friends because they counter enemies without being very harmful themselves. ..like paying the cops to keep you safe and they cost less than what the robbers would steal and that makes the cops "good"
But without enemies, you don't need those friends.

If you wind up with more enemies than friends in there, wipe em ALL out and start over.

Ode



At 12:49 AM 4/27/2010 +0800, you wrote:




       People new to CS sometimes worry that while killing off "bad"
       bacteria in the gut, the CS might also kill off "good" ones.
       If the people below are correct, that may not be a worry at all.
       Rowena


       http://bacteriality.com/2008/07/27/microbiome/#more-222
       <http://bacteriality.com/2008/07/27/microbiome/#more-222>
       http://bacteriality.com/ <http://bacteriality.com/>



       Long article. Quotes below:


       Finally, bacteria enter the picture ­ the rise of metagenomics
       and the Human Microbiome Project

The paradigm shift described above, in which genetic mutations are viewed in a new light, has been largely fueled by a new movement in which scientists are now beginning to use molecular technology to detect and sequence bacteria in lieu of simply trying to grow them in the lab. These tools will allow researchers to bypass the need to culture bacteria, exploring the human microbiome by studying genes en masse, rather than studying the organisms themselves.

Recent studies that have used powerful molecular tools rather than standard cultivation techniques have left scientists slack-jawed at the number of bacterial DNA sequences that correspond to bacteria yet to be named or sequenced. A great number of sequences also correspond to bacteria never thought to have the capability of living on or within the human body. It has recently become all too clear that only a fraction of the bacteria capable of infecting humans grow in the lab, and that we have been oblivious to the presence of the majority of pathogens capable of entering our bodies. This realization that we harbor myriad unnamed and unidentified microbes comes at a time when the Human Genome Project is failing to capitalize on its promise to identify root causes for human disease.


As Mullard admits, "The microbes that swarm in and on the human body have always held a certain fascination for researchers. Since so few of them grow in the lab, it has been difficult to work out exactly who these microbial passengers are and how they interact with one another." Whereas over the past century, standard laboratory culturing techniques have failed to detect the vast number of pathogens capable of infecting human beings, recent advances in molecular technology that allow for the sequencing of bacterial DNA mean that, at long last, we may be able to successfully identify and sequence the bacteria that cause disease."

The reality is that the plethora of unknown pathogens that colonize the human body are the previously unrecognized puzzle piece behind chronic inflammatory disease. Enter metagenomics, a relatively new field of research that, thanks to advanced molecular techniques, enables researchers to study organisms not easily cultured in a laboratory as well as organisms in their natural environment.

..........................

This isn't to say that there aren't species of gut bacteria that can provide a benefit to their host. Yet increasing evidence points to the fact that the vast majority of gut bacteria are actually responsible for causing many bowel diseases previously considered to be of "unknown" cause. When faced with the large number of different inflammatory bowel diseases and the fact that a tremendous number of uncharacterized bacteria inhabit the gut, it's logical that there's a connection between the two phenomena. Of course, Marshall's /in silico/ work, as well as data derived from the MP study site shows that patients who kill large numbers of gut bacteria end up recovering from a number of bowel diseases, providing a good deal of support for the above hypothesis.

This all invokes the rather controversial question, "Do humans really need gut bacteria?" Those patients to spend long periods of time on the MP have killed a great deal of their gut bacteria, yet seem to have GI tracts that function properly. Marshall has conceded that "good" gut bacteria could potentially exist, but as of yet, he has simply seen no evidence of a species that offers humans a benefit.


..........................

Rather than viewing the majority of them as "friends," we may unfortunately have to face the fact that many of them are enemies, or at least not necessary for our well-being. It still remains unclear if humans would want to be completely bacteria-free if the option existed, but the possibility that a person would be in better health without bacteria is nevertheless an intriguing possibility. Or perhaps in the future, humans will be able to pick and choose the bacteria that will inhabit their guts, in order to harbor certain species that fit their specific needs.

.........................

Several studies support the possibility that chronic bacteria can infect the stem cells. A team of German researchers recently showed that patients who had suffered a heart attack (an event most likely caused by chronic bacterial forms in the heart and blood vessels) had stem cells which were only about half as effective at repairing the heart tissue as stem cells transplanted from healthy 20 year-old males. This supports the view that infected stem cells lack many of the healing properties maintained by their healthy counterparts.

Dr Emil Wirosko, one of the foremost experts on L-form bacteria, died before he could publish on the subject. But according to his colleagues, Wirosko believed L-form bacteria are able to infect stem cells.

Then there are telomeres ­ DNA sequences on the ends of chromosomes that are gradually lost as cells replicate. As they shorten, a cell can no longer divide and becomes inactive or dies ­ meaning that the length of a person's telomeres plays a role in how quickly they will age. The fact that people with heart disease, Alzheimer's, cancer, and other illnesses have been shown to lose telomere sequences at a faster rate than their healthy counterparts suggests that the bacteria involved in causing such diseases may also have an effect on telomere length.^[2 <http://bacteriality.com/2008/07/27/microbiome/#footnote_1_222>] As Marshall describes, if pathogens do directly alter our DNA, then the weakened DNA at the ends of telomeres provides some of the easiest genetic material for them to mutate.



Once again then, the question is posed: What might occur if humans were to become largely bacteria-free? Might they age at a slower rate? The possibility is tantalizing. Data from people on the Marshall Protocol, who are gradually reducing their bacterial loads, will prove to be increasingly insightful in this regard as time wears on.

As previously discussed, the sequencing of the human genome alone does not allow for the Gattaca-like world described earlier in which humans could be identified and catalogued by their unique DNA sequences. Ironically, the human Microbiome Project and Marshall's work might make that world more of a reality. If it turns out that the bacteria we harbor are a source of disease and a burden on the innate immune system, then the population will seek (like those people on the MP) to eliminate at least the majority of them.





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
 <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>