This isn't relevant at all, since I clearly state - I ENJOY inquiry and
investigation, and encourage it. That's healthy, but that's not
skepticism, which is not careful, rational, and intuitive
study/investigation/exploration/trial, but an extreme of such to the
point that outcomes are often ignored, or summarily discounted. Anything
else is arguing over semantics, and you are welcome to do that.. With
/yourself/.
We already have a fine example of a skeptic in a previous email, let me
quote it here; (and this is totally fine, it's a reality he is
comfortable with, God bless him)
/"I don't even look anymore, If I hadn't seen anything in the past 75
years it is highly unlikely I would recognize it anyway. "/
Jason R Eaton wrote:
Hi Bodhisattva:
<snip>
