Correct me if I am wrong, but absolutely NOTHING physically comes off of the negative terminal during production, right? The only thing that comes off would be electrons reacting with water molecules or incoming silver ions or a few amount of contaminant cations. I'm wondering if the ideal gen has a lot of surface area on cathode also. If so, copper would be preferable so you don't pay for all that extra silver.
Hey, could that also make a gen that doubles as a colloidal copper setup? What do people use colloidal copper for anyway? ~David On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Dan Nave <[email protected]> wrote: > The cathode (in this case the negative terminal) can be copper if you > are not polarity switching. > > The anode (in this case the positive terminal) must be silver. > > You can see I don't agree with cking, as usual... > > Dan > > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM, David AuBuchon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is there any reason everyone uses silver for the cathode? I can > understand > > if people were reversing the polarity. But when things only go one way, > > does it matter what the cathode is made of? Could it just be copper > wire? > > > > Also, isn't the surface area of the cathode important. With the anode, > more > > surface area reduces the density of a layer of silver ions coming off, > > combining with hydroxide ions. At the cathode end, isn't there a dense > > layer of hydroxide combining with incoming silver ions? > > > > Thanks, > > ~David > > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subjectunsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
