I think if it works right it is a heck of a lot less expensive than the stabilized O2.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Stephen Rose <[email protected]>wrote: > I did wonder about that. I think we can fix it. Let's modify it this way: > > .224/x = .03 > > Solving for x, > > x = .224/.03 = 7.46666.... > > So, subtracting the one ounce of fluid that represents the mms to be > diluted, you would add 6.47 ounces of water to get 3% using the 22.4% sodium > chlorite figure. The 5.3% filler might affect this slightly, but I don't > think it would change it very much. It looks like even if you used the > previous numbers, you would end up with about 2% sodium chlorite which is > still in the range of stabilized oxygen. What do you think? > > Steve > > > > On 9/13/2010 10:18 PM, Renee wrote: > >> Ah--the rub comes in here--Jim Humble says it's 28% sodium chlorite. It >> is NOT. Since the sodium chlorite that the MMS is made from also has >> some 'filler' material in the flakes, when the s chlorite is made into >> MMS as per Jim's instructions, it's actually a 22.4% of Sodium Chlorite. >> The other 5.3% is the filler material. >> So--does this effect the number of drops used to get at a 2 to 3% >> stabilized oxygen formula of sodium chlorite? Dunno. As I said--math >> challenged. >> Samala, >> Renee >> /-------Original Message-------/ >> Well, I wouldn't say that I'm a math whiz. But maybe I can help. So, >> if you have an ounce of mms at 28% concentration, that ounce contains >> ..28 ounce of sodium chlorite. >> >> >> > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
