Thanks for posting this. I hadn't heard about it. I makes perfect sense to me--apparently the milk doesn't make people's hair fall out and make them deathly sick, and once you buy the cow your expenses are minimal.
The only name of the game is money. The FDA cares less about us. It cares about the pharmaceutical and medical estblishment. If the FDA bans it and the alternative method makes sense and doesn't make someone a fortune, it's worth looking into. My dentist told me an interesting story the other day. He has a brother who is a sales rep for one of the big pharmaceuticals who mfr those expensive cancer meds. The brother's company is having a problem with a competitive company which is eating into their sales. To keep the doctors in the home camp, he is authorized to offer them a "research" opportunity. They give patients this company's cancer drugs, keep some records on it, and are paid --sit down, please--are paid $12,000 a MONTH for their research. In return, the company makes boocoos $ on all the drugs they sell. As the dentist said, it's not which drug is best for the patient but which drug is best for the doctor's wallet. If cows milk can take the place of the drugs which have side effects which can ruin your life--and your pocketbook--to what lengths do you think the big guys will go to to assure the early demise of a cheap alternative method which profits them nothing? This court battle is brought to you by the guys who are pushing a law to make you pay an office visit and a prescription to take 1000 mg of vitamin C a day.
