Katarina Wittich wrote: > > Hey Vikki, > are you guys talking about making sure particle size is measurable and > reproduceable -- as well as ppm? > It's one of the main questions I have, since it seems we don't know much > about how particle size affects the usefullness of cs or it's effectiveness > for various ailments. Other than knowing that really big is bad -- but maybe > has it's uses?
This is something to add to the agenda. Bluntly I don't know and I wonder how the "Standard Simple Generator" will work in this area. My understanding, which is BY NO MEANS the last word on anything other than, possibly, confusion is that small particle size is a result of current flow involved. Assuming I understand this (DO NOT bet on it :) low current flow (and I have no idea what that range might be) results in smaller particle size where heavy current flows result in larger particles being "blown off" the electrodes. This will probably be addressed when setting up parameters for doing formal trials. James Osborne seems like the one that can shed light on this area, but there may be others. Take care, Vikki. -- Victoria Welch, WV9K, DoD#-13, Net/Sys/WebAdmin SeaStar.org, vikki.oz.net #include <coffee.h> My web site: http://vikki.oz.net/~vikki/ "Walking on water and developing software to specification are easy as long as both are frozen" - Edward V. Berard. Do not unto others, that which you would not have others do unto you. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
