I had a brief read and it sounds no different to any other product marketer to
me.
A few quotes from article:
"consists of very tiny (about 10 nanometers long) particles of pure elemental
silver suspended in a solution of very pure water"
#Surprise, surprise, "about 10nm long"? Broadly speaking, isn't that pretty
much what we produce? Was their solutions produced using HVAC or LVDC? What
do they term a 'particle'? And is that '10 nanometers' the *largest* particle
contained within?
"The last silver patent was issued in 1924."
#And what would that product have been, or consisted of back in 1924 I wonder?
"presents no risk for developing Argyria"
#Neither does home made stuff. I've never found any reference to Argyria being
associated with what we produce in the home {outside of some on this List who
state otherwise, and that's not a criticism, just an observation that needed to
be included}.
"fulfills the definition of being non-toxic"
#No surprise here either, so does ours using available literature in the public
domain as reference material.
"The only adverse event known, from the medicinal use of silver, is Argyria"
#And what form would that 'medical use of silver' have taken to produce that
'adverse event'?
"This means that only the smallest of particles can be placed under the label
of nano particle."
#Particles that can be placed under that 'nano' label is *any* particle that's
under 1 micron in size. Any literature one picks up states that particles
below 1 micron *become* nano scale!
"Silver Sol 10 ppm And 22 ppm Were Not Cytotoxic To Healthy Cells"
#Again, same as ours. It's only toxic to already dieing cells which would be
removed by our natural elimination processes anyway.
Conclusion:
'Techno babble'. It's all marketing hype to me David, not dissimilar to
anything else I may find in the public domain. It's a wide open market out
there, and everyone's trying to get in on the action stating all manner of
stuff. This 'competing' with each other doesn't do much for anyone in my mind.
Not meaning to boost this List at all, but some here are far more open, honest
and genuine than can be found most anywhere else. If I considered that not to
be so, I wouldn't waste my time being here. I can read any amount of BS from
any number of sources elsewhere.
People need to understand better what it is they actually make in the home, and
understand the varying forms of what it is they make, and the possible varying
efficacies of those forms.
I could be wrong, so be it, it's just my take on it from a personal perspective
that's all. No criticism or offence intended <g>.
N.
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:47:55 -0800
> Subject: Re: CS>some info on BYU kill study
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> And some ASAP studies citing 16PPM EIS does NOT destroy probiotics.
> Going to have to give this one a thorough read and see if it is legit:
> http://www.nursedetective.com/market/safetysummary.pdf
>
> ~David
