See: http://stevebeckow.com/2011/10/review-of-smart-meters
Marshall On 10/20/2011 8:12 PM, Mike Winslow-Hansen wrote:
don't let them put one in your house.... fight this people.. this stuff is bad news. ----- Original Message ----- *From:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2011 3:20 PM *Subject:* Re: CS>smart meter shielding "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" wrote: stopsmartmeters. org/...any body know about these building electric smart meters >>response: *They're bad news. Kathy* http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/?page_id=382 Read the report Scientists Urge Halt of Wireless Rollout and Call for New Safety Standards: Warning Issued on Risks to Children and Pregnant Women “Current US and ICNIRP standards for radiofrequency and microwave radiation from wireless technologies are entirely inadequate. (Olle Johansson, professor, The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, and The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) The combined effect of cell phones, cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI and wireless internet place billions of people around the world at risk for cancer, neurological disease and reproductive and developmental impairments. Reflections can significantly increase localized RF levels. Hondou et al (2006) establishes that power densities 1000 times to 2000 times higher than the power density predictions from computer modeling (that does not account properly for reflections) can be found in daily living situations. The RF hot spots can significantly increase RF exposure--even above current public safety limits. “In the case of the eyes and testes, direct relaxation of power density limits is not permitted.”(p. 30) This leaves unanswered what instantaneous peak power is permissible from smart meters. The level must be below 4000 uW/cm2. This report shows clearly that smart meters can create instantaneous peak power exposures where the face (eyes) and body (testes) are going to be in close proximity to smart meter RF pulses. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ In a message dated 10/18/2011 3:23:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: From what I understand, the network is a high fault tolerance interconnected "star" topology network. The antenna is omnidirectional because of this. It has a high poll rate plus it's event activated traffic. E.g. If someone goes to the toilet at night and uses the light. Or when high current draw. Devices are used such As irons, toasters and kettles. This would be used for analytics in a data warehouse by the utilities company. They also have zigbee radio connectivity so that new devices can provide detailed on their operation which would then be used by the utilities company. I have done some work on this as I have worked in healthcare. On 18 Oct 2011, at 19:16, Marshall <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Electromagnetic radiation drops off to the square of the distance. Thus if you are 10 feet from your meter, and 100 feet from the neighbor's, you will receive 100 times as much radiation from yours than your neighbors. That assumes that the antenna is omnidirectional. If the antenna is directional, or they are using the wiring as the antenna, all bets are off. Marshall On 10/18/2011 1:59 PM, Shirley Reed wrote:Anyone know if tachyon items can shield from this thing?? If the energy from these meters travels for 5 miles, then wewould need to shield from everyone's meters and that doesn't seem possible. But it is quite possible that I don't understand the situation. :) If the energy goes out from everyones meter, does it go just in one direction or all around? Seems to me that we need to know this before any strategy can be devised for protection. My house has one of these things. Scary. pj
