Sharon wrote: > It's very possible that Hazel herself was distraught by the > author's representation of her work and medical philosophy. ... > I would suppose that Hazel Parcell's book would reflect her own > beliefs and how she arrived at them. I would be much more inclined > to accept what she herself wrote if it didn't interfere with my > scientific reasoning. After all, who would be better at lending > credibility to her medical philosophy and explaining it in terms > we can all understand than the lady herself.
Sharon, I understand and agree. If such bad writing can spoil things for *me*, a person who is sympathetic to alternative health ideas in general, imagine the people it turns away, and blocks from help and health! Folks who simply won't agree to dress in whiteface and a clown suit and jump through hoops just because "somebody said" that's what you're supposed to do. And not just them, but everybody they can and will influence! > Experiments should be reproducible - they should all fail in the > same way That's the way of science!! <GRIN> Be well, Mike D. [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [[email protected] ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
