I don't filter, but the system automatically decants since it pulls the
water from the top.
Marshall
On 10/10/2012 11:31 PM, Neville Munn wrote:
I also won't entertain the idea of auto polarity reversal for the same
reason Dave stated, but then I'm not a commercial enterprise. If I
was selling the stuff, then I would have to consider that option due
to production volumes and time. Something must go somewhere off those
electrodes and the only place that 'something' can go is back into the
water, however, it won't be immediately observable due to that
polarity reversal switching back and forth. If they are not removed
and cleaned at regular timed intervals to minimise that 'something'
being dispersed in the water, then whatever comes off those electrodes
will remain circulating in the water and end up at the bottom of the
storage vessel after gravity has done its thing.
@ Marshall...Do you ever decant or filter...Yes/No?
N.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:44:16 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CS>Beck blood purifier
Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective
and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of
silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and
I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates
the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed
to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen
immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to
silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode,
either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from
the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The
result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be
cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set
of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them.
Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to
polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the
stirring of the water, not a polarity switch.
Marshall
On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote:
The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is
a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one
electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then
simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next,
keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos
current.
The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark
oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they
get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode
will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much
quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial
as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just
not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also
creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though
that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation
to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of
polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water
and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to.
With best wishes, Dave
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like
the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a
build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes
(hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and
it will save a bit for the time being :-)
Are there any "cons (& pros)" to this notion. I would
appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you.
regards
hg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date:
10/10/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12