it is too early to say anything. we know that 'colloidal' silver is GOOD. nano is something else, still unknown. but big pharma will jump at any opportunity to demonize silver. it is enough to use the words 'silver' and 'free radicals' a few times for people to make the wrong association. anyway the article is vague, most probably sponsored by big pharma. unfortunately researchers are as coward as any others, maybe more so because they fear losing their fat salaries. have you read how the cowards at harvard have retracted their findings about aspartame because they got their funding slashed?
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 6:42 PM, Jim Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: "Because of the possibility of human exposure to nanoparticles, there is an urgent need to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular responsesthat might be triggered." More pharmacrook scare crap. On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Karl Becker <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, > >Came across this article about research showing nano silver particles being >harmful to human cells. > >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140227115424.htm > > >Interested to see what others have to say about this research report. > > >Cheers Karl.
