Just my opinion but I would think things like cigarettes, sugar, toilet paper, coffee, clean water, matches and antibiotics would be worth their weight in gold/silver. Lola H. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Ode Coyote <[email protected]> wrote:
> ..Until people reaslize the system is permanently busted and the cash > worth no more than wall paper. > Then FOOD and fuel will be king. > Only when the absolute necessities are in surplus and trade/commerce > resumes, will gold and silver have value beyond the intrinsic based on > actual every day usefulness as a substance vs a symbol...and silver is much > more useful than gold. > > Ode > > On 10/14/2014 7:16 PM, Ron wrote: > > Yes. I think that having cash on hand is protection against a banking lock > down. > Any kind of financial crisis could close the banks and ATM's and /or > simply limit the amount of cash one can withdraw. With cash on hand you can > buy groceries and gasoline and other vital necessities. > > Ron > > On 10/14/2014 3:45 PM, Olushola Camara wrote: > > Yes, if the catastrophe is nation wide or global. There are always > regional catastrophes like Katrina or mid-west tornadoes, but the economy > keeps on churning elsewhere. > > Olushola > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:01 PM, ASL raVen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I thought cash would be useless in a time of severe strife and silver >> would be more valuable to trade? >> >> >> >> >> RaVen >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active. > > > > > ------------------------------ > <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active. > >
