It does look crappy as far as the church thing, I think the move in general makes sense but the whole Bishop stuff makes me cringe. As far as is it honest to do this? I believe that it is! I believe with everything in me that we have the right to choose for ourselves and stop having others decide for us! We already are losing much by way of choice and if being a member of this church can make a difference for me in keeping my job as the mandate for being vaccinated or fired is held over our heads then I am in! Religious exemptions at least for now are possible. Not much here to disagree with... http://genesis2church.org/membership
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Sara Mandal-Joy <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't like his "religion" either - and I think he could do a whole lot > for a whole lot if he chose to give the research data, the specifics... > which he really hasn't done. However, that being said, he HAS described > the science of it. And there are many bright minds out there who have > verified what he has to say. It is not bleach. Simple chemistry will tell > you that. I seem to be highly sensitive to it, and never got over one drop > at a time - my herx reactions are intense, and that was all I could > tolerate. I have put it on the back burner as a must have first aid item, > and "in case of". Some bright minds are saying that the combo of MMS and > CS is the most efficient/effective way of treating ebola. Does Humble's > non-humble archbishopry make me want to barf? Absolutely!! But that does > not mean MMS is worthless? No. My inner guides and my reading/study have > told me it is an important thing to have available. I only have a little, > just enough for personal use, but one doesn't need a lot of it. > > I must say it really angers me when anyone - like Jim Humble - makes > their product THE answer to the world's problems. Certain brands of CS do > the same thing. And it feeds the feds' reactions to such products. BUT > just because the feds say MMS is a fraud - as they say of CS, it doesn't > mean it is so. And it angers me when people take up that rhetoric, > especially people who are benefitted by CS. > > I will also say, in defense of Humble. I think he's always had a > non-humble attitude. But his religiousity I think came as a way to protect > his product from being made illegal and confiscated. By declaring his > company a church, and his distributors priests or ministers or whatever, > and his product as a sacrament, he was trying to get around being > completely shut down. He wanted what he "believes" (therefore the church) > is a miracle product to not be again confiscated by the feds. Prety out > of the box thinking. I'm not sure how honest it is, although I think he > has convinced himself it is a matter of faith and principle as much as a > matter of science. I'm not sure either how effective his defensive stance > will be in the long run - in part because of his ego, and how his pompous > attitude turns folks off. He's already defrocked and escommunicated one > of his "priests" because he altered the teachings in some way from Humble's > presentation. What a drama. Anyways, my 2 cents. Sara > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
