Or on steroids...ROFPMSL N. From: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>Two studies shows risk with nanosilver Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:18:35 -0500 To: [email protected]
I saw the phrase 'bullshit on stilts' on facebook the other day. This might be a great opportunity to use it!Be well,Léna On Dec 18, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Jim Holmes wrote:In a word, the studies are deliberate bullshit. On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:38 PM, John Popelish <[email protected]> wrote:On 12/17/2014 09:10 PM, Phil Morrison wrote: I read both studies. How in the world does one measure inflammation and oxidative stress in artificial tissue?  Where are the amino acids, minerals, proteins, enzymes, and oxidation cell regulators, etc that a real body rallies to fight inflammation? The use of silver nitrate in this study contaminates the whole field.  One is reminded that CS should be used in babies' eyes, not caustic silver nitrate. And the implication that CS might be involved in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, or ALS is better left unmentioned, since we know these diseases are caused by aluminum plus mineral deficiencies.  Actually, I think they gave colloidal silver a break, in these tests, because they used silver nitrate as the control (same silver content, in ionic form) to compare with the trials of nano particles. Why they didn't use a silver free control, I don't understand. Did I read this wrong? -- Regards, John Popelish -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subjectunsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
