Thanks Neville, and by the way (so's not to send two emails) I got an email from Floyd which I replied to, and it contained the bit about not being able to be read by the silver list server - and my reply was returned! So who knows what's going on there! Dee
Sent from my iPad > On 19 Feb 2015, at 10:43, Neville <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well I was working on a pet private theory I've had for years regarding EIS. > From my earlier laboratory tests the pH was between 7.0 and 8.0, on the > alkaline side, even after weeks in storage, now if cancer and other nasties > supposed to thrive or grow or multiply in an acidic environment I considered > perhaps this could have something to do with how efficacious this stuff is, > and I sort of still believe it has some merit. > > I also believe if taken first thing in the morning before breakfast the > stomach acid will be at it's lowest ebb, due to having nothing to digest for > a number of hours during the night, this also is included in my pet theory > for efficacy. I have only stumbled upon one article which supports that > view. May be common knowledge to other folk, but being a numpty I only > considered it in more recent times. > > As you may remember, I have always held the belief that EIS ingested > immediately after brewing contains the highest amount of Ag+ ions, {which it > does}, and hence is at its highest in efficacy, due to relative dormancy of > stomach acid as explained above. One other pH test I had undertaken in the > past, {tested within hours of production and apparently was extremely high > alkaline from what the bloke said} convinced me I may not be talking out of > my hat. All these in combination I had hypothesised could, and I repeat, > "could", have something to do with why this stuff is so good for some health > issues. > > Now of course everything, other than the stomach acid thing, is all > hypothesising and simply pie in the sky and has been blown completely out of > the water with these other pH tests I had just got done. > > It now seems one just cannot rely and/or trust anyone else to perform any > form of tests, nor can one rely on the cleanliness of equipment used for that > testing. There are just too many inconsistencies and potential variables > with DW, personnel involved in the testing, equipment used, unknown > contaminants etc etc. > > It just annoys me that I can find zero information in the public domain > regarding the stuff we make, everything revolves around that damn so called > "colloidal silver" and it's illegitimate cousins. I am unable to find > anything to do with our predominantly ionic product which can be taken as > gospel or of any relative value. > > Today was a disappointing day for me. OK, I may use a cheap brand of DW, but > it would be nice to try Pure Water such as chemists use for prescriptions, or > other water of excellent purity for pH testing, even RO water, which I > can't/won't do in my kitchen anyway, so not being strong on patience I shan't > bother messing around with pH for a while now. The more answers or clues I > look for only turns up even more questions and uncertainties. > > N. > > Subject: Re: CS>Electrode cleaning? > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:42:19 +0000 > To: [email protected] > > That's very interesting Neville and full marks for perseverance! I've never > tested for ph - only ppm and my distilled water always reads '0' on that and > the CS always ends up about 15. Does ph matter - I mean I know it does in > our bodies, but does it in CS? Many thanks...Dee >
