Neville, I personally cannot expand beyond what you've come up with. I wonder whether it would help to understand what viruses in general are. Following is quoted from Merriam Webster:
*Virus* *definition* is - any of a large group of submicroscopic infectious agents that are usually regarded as nonliving extremely complex molecules, that typically contain a protein coat surrounding an RNA or DNA core of genetic material but no semipermeable membrane, that are capable of growth and multiplication only in living cells, and that cause various important diseases in humans, animals, and plants; also : filterable *virus* On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:47 AM Neville Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > For some reason this message was not "delivered", twice, so, I deleted the > subject, now I will try again for the third time. > > Man, it's soooooo hard to find anything worthwhile. > > OK, I had no luck with my original question, maybe I might get better luck > if I word it differently, so, here's another question. I am over this, I > can search the Internet all day long, and STILL can't find anything > useful. The Internet is sooooo full of crap. (opinion) Maybe I can't find > anything because I don't live in the world of Academia? > > Simple question requires a simple answer...YES/NO? Is this Corona thing a > SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM? > > Damn it all, here's one statement I found, although I believe viruses > *are* single celled organisms, but perhaps someone can put me > straight....Please, put me out of my misery. > > I even looked up the Flu, which Corona is, and I got this below... > > Quote: "Answer and Explanation: *Viruses* are not considered living > *cells*, and therefore are neither *single*-*celled* nor multi-*celled*." > End quote. WHAT THE...? So what the hell is it then? > > If it *IS*, then my original question is finally answered. > > Thank You, whoever You might be <g> > > N. > >
