Sorry Doug, for some reason I didn't get Reids post, so I have to reply on your post, and have deleted your comments in case my comment doesn't get through on this Silverlist email service.
Reid, I have been using a unit I made from Bob Beck design many years ago, hmmm, well I think it is, and I converted it to AC 24vDC transformer. I made my own magnetic stirrer, I make about 1200ml each time, and up to 20ppm by meter, (not reliable I know, but at least I can see I made 'something'), sometimes it goes to 22 or so, I am not pedantic about ppm, and I time it on the half hour so I can remove the rods to wipe them clean. I made my unit using 2, 3mm wire, it'll last me my lifetime, and I'll be pushing 70 in a couple of months <g>. Oh, I have Nebulised it as well, well I haven't, but the wife has when she had the Shingles, and developed a cough. As for information, I don't even look for it anymore, there is nothing to find regarding what we make. I've been taking 20-30ml every day for over 16 years, I ain't blue yet, and never will. I have a 'yard stick', if it's clear, I can drink as much as I want, although I never need to drink that much, and if I need to, it's only 2, 8 ounce glasses a day for about 5 days, if it's yellow or golden, I just cut down on the amount I drink, if its amber or tea coloured, then I mostly use it for injuries. If I see NO mud laying on the bottom of my storage vessels, then it's absolutely fine (personal opinion). Even when I was hospitalised a while back with a brain bleed, I STILL ingested my maintenance amount every morning, of course, I didn't tell them that. I will NEVER say what we/I make is "CS", because by definition it is not. That's why you can only read information, they refer EVERYTHING as "CS", you can't find any information on it because ours is a different manufacturing process. I suggest....Stop reading whatever you find on the Internet. Mostly is innuendo and misrepresentation, and bold faced lies. To your question, your quote..."what about the reliability of the article" end quote, NO, not reliable. (opinion). So, here's a second opinion, this can follow the information from Doug. N. ________________________________ From: Douglas Haack <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 29 March 2020 9:59 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: CS>An article causing concern -- making/consuming "Non NANO Particle CS" On Sunday, 29 March 2020, 3:07:44 am AEDT, Reid Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
