Journal of Applied MicrobiologyVolume 123, Issue 5 Here is an authoritative review documenting the effectiveness of silver. There is all the evidence that is needed here and none of it can be characterized as "anecdotal.":
https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jam.13525#jam13525-bib-0013 Of particular interest at this time would be the information of action against viruses: "Antiviral activity of natural mineral silver in a variety of forms including colloidal silver has been demonstrated through nearly three decades of medical research (Fig. 2). It has been reported that silver can stop different types of viruses from replicating by merely binding to them. Recent research demonstrates that silver is so powerfully effective against viruses that it even stops the deadly HIV virus from infecting human cells. The vital requirement in order to exhibit such powerful antiviral activity is the size of the silver particles. Nanoparticles of size ranging from 1 to 100 nm are efficient as smaller size leads to more interaction and inhibition of viruses (Galdiero et al. 2011; Khandelwal et al. 2014). Silver nanoparticles undergo a size‐dependent interaction with HIV‐1 virus and nanoparticles in the size range of 1–10 nm were able to attach to the virus. The interaction is via preferential binding of AgNPs to the gp120 glycoprotein knobs which bear the exposed sulfur residues and inhibit the virus from binding to host cells in vitro (Elechiguerra et al. 2005)." Careful reading will reveal that our quest to maximize the ionic portion of what we make has been the correct approach. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Deborah Gerard Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 3:02 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Hypothesis There have been many posts about CS taking out the virus...check with previous posts. On Friday, May 15, 2020, 11:34:39 PM EDT, Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote: LOL. Well Dan, nobody else seems to know anything about it anyway, so perhaps it's best maintain your "physical distancing" ROFPMSL. I need to speak with a virologist <rolling eyes>, there's never a virologist when you want one. N. From: Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, 16 May 2020 12:50 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: CS>Hypothesis I'm going to maintain "physical distancing" from this post... On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote: OK, here's a hypothesis for this Covid crap and a couple of simple Yes/No questions. I'm not a virologist or biochemist so these are simple questions. A Virus, in this case Coronavirus, (which is the normal Virus we get every year, which we know had been 'manipulated' in a laboratory), is 'not living', so, when it enters a lung cell it then takes 'life' from that cell, then it multiplies, then it 'breaks' out of the cell as a 'living' cell/s and spreads. We know EIS will kill Viruses, so, if a Nebuliser is used, then the silver will/should kill that/those Corona cell/s...Yes/No? If Yes, then whilst the silver 'vapour' is distributed throughout the lungs those lung cells become surrounded by the silver in the lungs, hence the Virus cannot enter the lung cell...Yes/No? Eventually because the virus cannot enter the lung cells due to the cells being surrounded by silver, they should die by natural attrition...Yes/No? If anyone can answer, KEEP IT SIMPLE please. N.
