V wrote: I disagree with limiting information that is vital to us all. The political situation has ramifications for us all and for shuttering use of colloidal silver and other remedies. Having said that we all need to back up our statements with decent links. Which will not of necessity all fall under today's bought and paid for so called fact checkers. If a person simply takes a look and puts some questionable info to the side and drop excessive pride and in humility stay the course of examining a lot of information and yes there is a lot and it requires reading and focus and humility to be ready to examine long held and emotional responses, then eventually there is much gained in figuring out who we are and what has happened, where we are going versus where we should be going. If we limit what can be said anywhere how do we make better decisions. The presuppositions we are basing our knowledge on need all to be examined right from where you believe we came from. We all need to grow up and if any of us cant handle or simply dont agree we have many basic problems to examine then skip past. Just my two cents.
================================= V, You covered so many points in that one paragraph! All of the points you brought up are very wise. They make a great deal of sense to me. There is too much going on in the world for us to ignore at this point. However . . . to assist those who don't want to read about any issues except those concretely and directly related to specific health conditions: Perhaps we could put "OT" in the header. This stands for "off topic." (It's not OT to us, but it's OT to them.) What do you think? Nenah Sylver, PhD author, The Rife Handbook of Frequency Therapy and Holistic Health, 5th Edition <http://www.nenahsylver.com/> www.nenahsylver.com NEW Etsy Shop: Earth Riches Handmade, one-of-a-kind jewelry of semi-precious stones from the Earth plus rare and unique vintage items <https://www.etsy.com/shop/EarthRiches> https://www.etsy.com/shop/EarthRiches
