Research the following: "change a humans genetics by the mRNA Vax, their DNA is now US patentable" -- US Supreme Court has ruled in 2013 . . .
YOU have had your GENETICS SOLD-On (the Jab company owns your NEW genome, they have changed you from a HUMAN to (TRANS-HUMAN) via your present or (future) mRNA JAB -- without your CONSENT . . . you never signed your consent to be CHANGED . . . https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/testing/genepatents/ Can genes be patented? A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization, or corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used, in both commercial settings, such as clinical genetic testing, and in noncommercial settings, including research, for 20 years from the date of the patent. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having sole ownership of genetic testing for patented genes. On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that human genes cannot be patented in the U.S. because DNA is a "product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, so patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 human genes were patented. The Supreme Court's decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing. The 2013 Supreme Court's ruling did allow that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins . . . . . . (called messenger RNA) -- you are F u x ked . . . .
