Dear Katarina.
Back in late 1997 I posted some information that
addressed the current draw considerations. Our technical staff had
determined that the "current rate" appeared to have no effect, whatever, on
particle size, no matter how rapid the rise in value----until it reached a
specific region.....then agglomeration did start to occur. These
evaluations involved DC systems, only. The nominal value for current, at
which the particle sizes appeared to escalate in size, was around 12.5 M.A.
for simple two electrode systems with average clearance distance
approximately 1.25" (Regardless of the applied voltage). For four
electrode systems using the same clearance distances, the current value was
approximately 23.5 M.A. There were numerous variations in the "exact"
generation system arrangements (including, aggitation, accelerants,
temperature, applied voltage, etc), but the single most important
parameter---we believe---is the upper limit at which one regulates, or stops
the current flow from the generation system.
In direct answer to your question relating to our using constant
current limitation schemes (1 to 5 M.A.); yes, we have employed a variety
of them. None yielded results with advantages sufficient enough to warrant
their inclusion in our "high-volume" (or private) Colloidal Silver
generation systems. .
Sincerely. Brooks Bradley..
Katarina Wittich wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I'd love to hear feedback on this dialogue I've been having with Brooks
> off-list.
> And Brooks, were some of the runs current limited and some not?
> Thanks,
> Katarina
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> [email protected] -or- [email protected]
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
