Query:
Would the two doctors have seen it if it had not been
suggested by the patient?
Analysis:
Due to the conflict of interest (CS is a competing therapeutic) it's no
wonder there was no biopsy. They did not want to be proven wrong. The 3rd
doctor had no reason to biopsy something that lacked prima facie evidence of
its existence.
I personally think running to doctors for their opinion is a waste of time
and money, and a major threat to one's health. Consider that adverse
reactions to prescription drugs is the #3 cause of death, iatrogenic
disease is the #2 reason for a hospital visit, and medical mistakes is the
#5 cause of death..., well let's just say I follow the advice of the words
of Robert Mendelsohn (sp?) M.D. : "The best thing a doctor can do for his
patient is to go out of business."
jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Vilik Rapheles <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, December 23, 1999 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: CS>donna OK???? gone bye bye
>
>
>At 09:36 AM 12/23/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>If I recall correctly, only SHE could see any discoloration. Her
>>husband and son could not perceive it. So the problem was miniscule if
>>it existed at all. It makes me think there was no problem except
>>anxiety.
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Except that apparently two doctors saw it...
>
>~^^V^^~
>>
>
>
>--
>The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
>To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
>[email protected] -or- [email protected]
>with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
>To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
>
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
