If this is true, why are all the photos at high altitude? Why no close
ups where the spray can be seen coming out of actual nozzles instead of
mere inferred nozzles. Eyes are easily lead to see what they want and fears
want validation. The webmaster suggests spraying, then shows normal
contrails as proof. Spray does not have an invisible gaseous phase. It
comes out of sprayers as a mist..already in liquid form.
Yes, there is low level spraying going on, both legit and probably some
that is illigit and for many reasons. ..but that's not what the carnycon
website shows.
All perceptions can be distorted by preconceived opinions and beliefs. Con
men and propagandists "lead" belief formation, usually capitalizing on a
persons fears. In added note, you and everyone have almost no original
beliefs. Most of them were passed on to us and we don't often check them
out to see if they make sense and tend to ignore that which invalidates.
KD'C
At 07:24 AM 7/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
They aren't spraying at high altitudes. That's the difference between
contrails and chemtrails. Chemtrails are sprayed below the altitude in
which contrails can form.
Diane
Ode Wan Coyote wrote:
>
> I did for about 2 years. Study up on the characteristics of steam and
> how it condenses in a turbulent atmosphere as produced by an airplane tail
> and relates to various temperatures and humidity. ALL of the photos on that
> site depict normal contrail formation.
> That's not to say that no one is getting sprayed, but widespread spraying
> at high altitude is the absolutely worst way to hit any sort of
> target,,,and VERY expensive. There are all sorts of ways to target a
> population that far surpass "Chemtrails" They'd be lucky to hit the
> desired state much less a desired population center. Have you any idea as
> to how HUGE this country is and how many billions of gallons of chemicals
> it would take to cover it indescriminately?
> As for the fibers and such, there are records of globs and fibers having
> fallen from the sky that go as far back as the 1700s. Charles Fort wrote
> about them in the 1800s. That's not from jets. UFOs or those rod things
> maybe, but not jets.
> KD'C
>
> At 11:35 PM 6/30/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >open your eyes
> >
> >
> > > Try carnival-con.com
> > >oops, I mean carnicom.com
> > >
> > > Nice pics of perfectly normal contrails being touted as the threat
of the
> > >day and no distinction between obvious misinformation and possible
reality
> > >so far.
> > > KDC
> > >
> > >At 02:01 PM 6/29/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > >>Hi Pamela,
> > >>
> > >>carnicorn.com doesn't work for me. Any ideas why? Spelling correct?
> > >>
> > >>Trem
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>At 03:25 PM 6/29/00 -0500, you wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Marsha, take a visit to carnicorn.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> >Dear Marshall,
> > >>> >The day before yesterday I was watching "Unsolved Mysteries" on
Lifetime
> > >>> >Channel and one segment was about a town in Washington getting some
> > >>> >gelatinous goo dumped on it, making folks sick. Talk about weird! I
> > didn`t
> > >>> >see the segment when it first aired, so I don`t know how old it
was. I
> > >>> >wonder if the town has had anything happen since then?
> > >>> >One of the citizens on the segment reported a lot of aircraft
> > >>>activity, and
> > >>> >even black choppers.
> > >>> > I wonder...
> > >>> >Marsha
> > >>> >PS, I printed out your post to show my sister, the ultimate
disbeliever.
> > >>> >Won`t even use CS...
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >--
> > >>> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal
silver.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail
message to:
> > >>> >[email protected] -or-
[email protected]
> > >>> >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > >>> >Silver-list archive:
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > >>> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
