Hi Ivan, On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:22:14 +1200, "Ivan Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Surely this investigation is flawed, or at least back to front. > >Would it not have been of greater interest to find the most effective >silver colloid, and then determine particle size and method of >production, rather than eliminate subjects (15) according to particle >size, and then test the remaining (4) for efficacy? > >The results may well be the same...but what is the reason for making >colloidal silver in the first place. Absolutely! The investigator has somehow predetermined what particle size should be tested. Perhaps there's something in the report that talks about his assumptions. If not, that would be another flaw. -- Dean -- from (almost) Duh Moines (CDP, KB0ZDF) -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
