Dean wrote: Whoa!! Is the documentation available somewhere online??? If not, why not? :)
>HOWEVER the "THE Programme" is holistic and most people would rather die >than follow it! >No more booze, no smoking, no sugar, no meat, no Coke (either kind), no >more Macktuckey, circadian controlled activities, >etc., >It sounds funny to say/write it, but to cure yourself requires that you >become healthy. Change the diet, change the lifestyle, change the attitude >and the body will do its best. I suspect you're being too strict (not that it doesn't work). In the 60's I had a friend (Bob Arnold) what was diagnosed with terminal cancer and had 6 months to live (I've forgotten exactly where the cancer was -- I suspect somewhere in the abdomen). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Dean & folks, 1. No the documentation like the Group is VERY much "underground". No organisation like it could exist in the "normal climate". It is very professional and strictly determined. You aren't even allowed in without having been substantiatedly diagnosed as suffering from Cancer. 2. Unfortunately, in the control groups and test groups the only 100% survivors (10 years +) have been full programme adherents. Frustratingly, from a statistical point of view, grade 3 and below groups ( relative strictness) will often show unaccountable remissions and then expire from another set of symptoms, e.g. Heart "attack", usually within 2-5 years. 3. The so-called "anecdotal" reports are legion and astoundingly, in 400+ cases followed by the Group, not one of them was proven to have actually had Cancer. No physiological evidence was found of typical damage. This is certainly not to say that cures have not been evidenced by such elemental things as a simple change in environment, as in Bob's case, but we have determined no realistic scientific evidence that we can rely upon to date. We do know that the Prime Programme works. Not usually, not mostly, but always. In fact, such statistical positive correlation is almost unheard of in any analysis. HOWEVER Obviously, it is not in the interests of our Owners to allow such information to be commonly available and the punishment inflicted on those who are "insiders" that stray is swift and is always a good lesson to others. For further information research such people as Krebs, the Laetrile Case, et al. My apologies to the list Manager and others who are more focussed on the List purpose, but while VERY interested in learning more of CS, this odd 2 cents worth has been posted with nothing more than good intentions to help us all get toward the goal of being what must have once, been normal. I have symptoms *I* want to relieve too!! Back to the Topic! There is a small paper on the programme available if anyone wishes it by contacting me directly Cheers! John " The worst effect of becoming more expert in an area, is the eventual realisation of just how little you know." Kylneth
