If you use Internet Explorer you have a feature that can be used to
eliminate OT noise.  Simply double-click on the offending message, then hit
reply.  Copy the senders name or email address.  Go to tools on the top menu
bar and select menu rules.  Select mail.  Make a mail rule and paste in the
whacko's name.  Once you have this in place it is easy to simply add a
persons name as they earn that distinction.  I started doing this when the
Apollo program was being called  a fake.

By the way, Mike, I want to thank you for the time and effort you put into
hosting this list.  You are obviously a very nice person.  You would,
however, make a terrible judge.

Best Regards to All,

Arnold

----- Original Message -----
From: "M. G. Devour" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Please stop ruining the CS list!


> Hi all!
>
> Steve's message, below, is typical of the kind I get off-list when we
> go through periods of high traffic and lots of off-topic discussions.
>
> I prefer folks send such comments to me directly, but since Steve
> sent it to the list *and* did such a gracious job, I'll respond here
> for everyone's benefit.
>
> Steve wrote:
> > Tonight I sampled 295 recent entries to the list to see what
> > percentage even mentioned CS.  The result was dismal - only 8.5%
> > even mentioned CS, silver, or electrolysing water!!
>
> Read it and weep, folks. That's the outcome of all this unbridled
> enthusiasm we've been seeing.
>
> I see in the most recent batch of messages that some CS related
> threads have actually emerged. Thank you, folks!!!
>
> > Moderator Mike Devour has asked to keep the list submissions on
> > topic. I am surprised he allows so much non-topic stuff on his list.
>
> Lets review the standards for list topics...
>
> CS related discussions, basic or technical, are always on topic and
> may be discussed as long as there is interest.
>
> If somebody asks a health related question, you are welcome to reply
> with information not directly related to CS if you judge that it is
> likely to be helpful to them.
>
> Such off-topic discussion should carry on just long enough to satisfy
> people's initial curiosity *and* direct them to other resources,
> sites, forums, publications, etc. After that the topic should fade
> away or be taken off-list by those still interested in it.
>
> If this is the third or fourth message you've sent to an off-topic
> thread... That should be a clue you're going too far.
>
> Politics not *closely* related to CS or important alternative health
> issues should simply be avoided. *All* politics should be limited to
> the least necessary to direct people to other resources off-list.
>
> Religious topics should be limited to the occasional passing remark or
> words of encouragement or thanks, and not be permitted to devolve into
> preaching, outright evangelism or doctrinal debate.
>
> Vendors, distributors, or practicioners are asked to limit their
> on-list activities to comments of general interest from the point of
> view of a knowledgeable individual helping others. Commercial
> activity or self promotion must be conducted off-list unless
> expressely approved of by me, in advance.
>
> No SPAM, chain letters, or urban legends, please. No personal
> attacks, aggressive behavior or gross or obscene material will be
> tolerated. <hint hint>
>
> > A lot of the messages are personal from one person to another, and
> > really should have been sent directly to the individual instead of
> > to the list.
>
> I have the default reply-to address set to the list posting address
> and not to the original author.
>
> The result of this is that nearly *all* comments end up back on the
> list, including thank you's and you're welcome's and the occasional
> personal comment that was meant to be sent privately.
>
> Most folks simply won't keep track of who their message is going out
> to, so if I set it up to reply to the original author most topics
> would end abruptly as they rapidly migrate off list, leaving many
> questions unanswered for the rest of the members.
>
> > I fear the serious researchers and users of CS will be driven off
> > the list because of the 90 plus percent of off-topics.  It is too
> > time consuming to wade through all the OT stuff which is not
> > supposed to be on the list in the first place.
>
> This has happened to some extent already, and we are the poorer for
> it. Also, the folks who come to us who are dealing with illness of
> their own or a loved one often do *not* have the time or stamina to
> cope with extensive off-topic posting. These folks deserve our
> consideration and courtesy.
>
> In contrast, however, we see that there is a real need and ample
> demand for just the kind of chit-chat and diversity that gets things
> going so heavy here sometimes. For that reason I will continue to
> allow other topics to continue as an undertone.
>
> I would just ask you to ask yourself whether the message you want to
> send is really important enough to consume the time of 350 people...
> or if it's worth cutting and pasting the address of the original
> author in place of the list address in the To: field before hitting
> 'send'.
>
> > I am grateful Mike owns and moderates this list.  It must be a time
> > consuming task.  Again, please respect his request to keep the
> > list on the topic for which it was created - CS.  100% on topic is
> > not realistic, but 70% or so should be achievable if we all
> > cooperate.
> >
> > --Steve Young
>
> I agree. Lately, even 50% would be a welcome change!
>
> As our newer members learn the boundaries and find a niche for
> themselves, I'm sure we'll get back to a more comfortable traffic
> volume and content quality. I've been a little slow responding, but I
> am asking folks to ease off. Be patient a little longer, please.
>
> Be well,
>
> Mike Devour
> silver-list owner
>
> [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
> [[email protected]                        ]
> [Speaking only for myself...               ]
>
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> [email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>