In a message dated 9/3/00 10:44:54 AM EST, [email protected] writes:
<< Hi List, This is quite a depressing post to read here on the CS list. I haven't been using CS for long, but the weeks are passing by, and almost every day I find another use for it, or find something that I can do, such as preservation, that I couldn't do before finding it. I have no interest in the 'official research', wherever it comes from. If something works for me, then that is all the research that I need. I realize that some listers are allergic to some substances, and therefore feel that they need to exercise caution. We are all intelligent enough to know what is the best treatment for ourselves. Think where we would be without so called anecdotal evidence. Most of the herbals wouldn't exist, and we wouldn't know about CS, UT, Natural Progesterone or Energy Healing. >> Carol: I think your knee-jerk reaction to anything official as completely biased is somewhat "over the top." Anecdotal evidence is a good STARTING POINT to consider the direction for developing more comprehensive future research, BUT it is NOT a sound way to obtain irrefutable scientific evidence -- no matter how intelligent we think we are. By condemning ALL so called official research as unreliable, you become as biased as those who you accuse of having their own brand of unfairness. Roger -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
