In a message dated 9/7/00 8:58:01 AM EST, [email protected] writes: << I have never seen one of these machines, so can't say for sure, but I thought both go above the water. The high voltage gradient is necessary to pull the colloid away from the wire sufficiently for it to not get sucked back into the wire on the next half cycle. Thus I believe that using both wires above the water will produce CS on both, but with one submerged, only one will be producing CS. Net effect, twice the production rate. But as I said I have no experience with this method. Marshall >>
Marshall: Thanks for that info. You know, since I'm using the "sputtered arc" method, I always thought I had to settle for CS production only from the arc-generating electrode. Now, however, I realized that I can put the other electrode just above the water so that it will "suck-up" the water into a spout and generate a little more production. BTW, I have been perfecting my sputtering technique, and I can control it much better now. I estimate "sputtering-type" production is on the order of 50% -- possibly allowing me to generate a ~50 PPM product instead of my usual 25-30 PPM. This type of CS may work better for systemic ailments. Roger -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
