Dear Roger,
                        Generalized conclusions relative to how the human (or
other higher mammalian) beings' immune system is affected by colloidal silver, 
is
fraught with uncertainty.  Primarily, because so very little is understood
relative to the actual activities of the various body processes actually
determining the "immune response".  And most especially.... the synergistic
relationships effecting from related, but separate contributors.  Most difficult
to determine are the dynamics of the endocrine system elements and enzyme
generators.....or the changing degree of their interaction.....under sudden and
varying challenges.
                One thing I feel I can safely relate is-----we have encountered 
no
evidence.....de facto or anecdotal, which demonstrates any immune system
compromises arising from the continual ingestion of moderate levels of colloidal
silver (.75 ounces per 100 lbs. body mass, daily average).  Our controlled 
studies
did not reach beyond 14 months.  However, our uncontrolled, generalized
evaluations cover up to 4 years.
                One circumstance you may find of interest is that.......from 
among
the pronounced majority of subjects observed, pathogenic afflictions among those
individuals receiving "prophylactic"----or greater----dosages of CS.....was (on
average) less than 10% of that occurring among the non-treated controls.  These
data included a number of twin siblings from among several different mammal
classes, including humans.
                Unfortunately, I can offer no definitive, purely statistical,
evidence upon which you can establish a conclusive paradigm relating to the 
human
"immune response", as modified by Colloidal Silver----one way or the other.
 Our speculations toward such would only be counter-productive to your inquiry.
                I wish I could have been of greater assistance in supplying you 
a
more satisfactory answer to your inquiry.
                    Sincerely,  Brooks Bradley.

[email protected] wrote:


> In a message dated 10/8/00 2:31:23 AM EST, [email protected] writes:
>
> << Subj:     Re: CS>info.
>  Date:  10/8/00 2:31:23 AM EST
>  From:  [email protected] (BROOKS BRADLEY)
>  Reply-to:  [email protected]
>  To:    [email protected] (elsauz)
>  CC:    [email protected]
>
>                              Dear Mr. Amaya,
>                          In our veterinary evaluations, we have obtained
> effective
>  controls/responses (for prophylactic applications) among, cattle, horses,
> pigs, sheep, dogs,
>  cats....and other small pets, with concentrations as low as one (1) part per
> 20,000,000.
>  Among the larger ungulates, effective responses were obtained at dilution
> levels of one part
>  in 100,000,000.  Be advised these are not levels found to be satisfactory
> for acute
>  conditions.....but have demonstrated to be quite effective for general
> prevention.   However,
>  some measureable degree of response has been gained even among certain test
> individuals
>  suffering from serious pathogenic insults.
>                                  Sincerely,  Brooks Bradley.
>   >>
>
> Brooks:
>
> I am interested to get your comments on using CS prophylactically for humans.
> Until recently, I thought it a good strategy to use CS that way, but recent
> discussion and experience have demonstrated to me that it is unnecessary, and
> perhaps, even unwise to follow such a protocol.
>
> As I said more than once on this forum, using CS prophylactically may overly
> "protect" our immune system from exposure to pathogens so that we lose
> opportunities to develop as large a spectrum of natural immunity as we might
> have otherwise. Secondly, Ivan Anderson argues that the amount of time free
> colloidal silver stays active in our system is so short that there is little
> chance that is will be available *just when* an infection is about to
> overwhelm our immune system. Third, by taking silver every day we are
> "training" our system's metal scavengers to be present in much higher that
> normal concentrations. In effect, these scavengers become so efficient in
> removing CS from our body that we lose much of the inherent benefits of CS
> because its residence time becomes so short. For example, when an infection
> hits, it has been my experience that CS seems to work better for first time
> users compared to habitual users. If these points are valid, why not use CS
> only when you sense you're coming down with an infection.
>
> The other day, I felt the beginning of a cold and sore throat. I sprayed CS
> down my throat, and tried to hold it there as long as possible (this exercise
> takes practice). I continued this procedure, and within 15 minutes these
> symptoms had all but disappeared. When they reappeared, I repeated the
> treatment until they disappeared again. A day later, I started to have a
> runny nose, so I sprayed CS up my nose until these symptoms disappeared as
> well. Bottom line: I wound up having a fraction of the discomfort compared to
> that experienced by a typical cold sufferer, but, I believe I was still able
> to train my immune system to recognise this (viral?) infection in the future .
>
> Roger
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> [email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>